City Council Minutes 2006 08 15 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City Council Meeting Minutes August 15, 2006 Page 7 of 13 RESOLUTIONS No. 36 and 37, SERIES 2006 MOTION: Mayor Sisk moved to continue Resolutions No. 36 and 37, Series 2006, to the October 3,2006, meeting, seconded by Council member Clabots. All in favor. Absent: Mayor Pro Tern Brown and Council member Muckle. RESOLUTION No. 38, SERIES 2006 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PROPOSED THREE-LOT PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION REPLAT, 333 EAST STREET, CLEMENTINE SUBDIVISION, FILING NO.2 Mayor Sisk requested a Staff presentation. Planning Director Wood explained the applicant is requesting authorization of a final subdivision replat of Lot One of the Clementine Subdivision to create three lots out of one 2.98-acre lot. The Clementine Subdivision was originally platted in 1987, plating a total of 4.03-acres, under single ownership, into two lots. Lot One was platted as a 2.98-acre lot, and Lot Two was platted as a .91-acre lot located at the northwest corner of East and Lock Streets. At the time of initial subdivision approval Lot Two contained an existing residence, and Lot One contained a group home. Lot Two is not within the scope of the subdivision request. The group home was authorized by a Special Review Use (SRU) in conjunction with platting of the property. The group home was constructed and licensed as a residential group home facility for 6-12 foster children. The current applicant and owner is a successor in interest to those previous approvals. The SRU was approved with three conditions, one of which placed a limitation on the number of residential units, which could occupy the property. The condition limited development on the 4.03-acre parcel to two residential units, or one residential unit and one group home. Any increase in density or use was required as a condition of approval to come back for review by the Planning Commission and the City Council. Also, as a condition of approval the City agreed to defer the installation of public improvements and the public-use dedication obligations of the subdivider. The record reflects the City Council was willing to defer public use dedication and public improvement obligations based upon the low impact of the approved group home. The public hearing record reflects at such time when there was an increase of density or use the City Council would then make a determination as to the exaction of those improvements. The Planning Commission reviewed the subdivision request both as a preliminary and as a final. On April 20, 2006 the Planning Commission passed by a vote of 8:0 a resolution approving a preliminary subdivision plat with conditions. Final plans were submitted to staff on May 18, 2006 and were reviewed by the Planning Commission at a special meeting on July 20,2006. The Planning Commission approved the final subdivision plat request by a vote