Laserfiche WebLink
Recreation Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />March 17, 2025 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />areas for future residential growth. Dick: we need more landscaping with any new <br />residential growth. Jeff: we don't have guidelines for multifamily design standards <br />which could be included in the Comp Plan. Dan: north of Redtail Ridge, is that <br />within the City limits? Jeff: no. Everett: what about design standards for <br />downtown? Jeff: this Plan would allow some residential growth (e.g., a condo <br />above a restaurant) to maintain the City's character. Kathy: RAB has focused in <br />the past on maintaining existing recreational facilities. Lisa: yes, this has been <br />part of RAB's workplan priorities. Jeff: we will keep the RAB informed about our <br />Plan development as part of public engagement. <br />Staff Updates <br />• Recreation and Senior Center Updates <br />1. Aquatic Amenity Update — Paul Borth <br />We have $75,000 in the CIP for adding splash pool enhancements. Focus is on <br />infants and preschoolers who can't use other pool areas safely. This includes a <br />newer and safer portable slide. We are limited by what we can fit in the wading <br />pool and the existing plumbing (see visual slides included with these meetings). <br />We are looking at new portable slide designs. Other play structures will be <br />replaced. We will replace the overhead three showers with something that is <br />more kid friendly. Total improvements would be at least $55,000 and would be <br />made during the LRC's maintenance week. Jets would remain as permanent <br />structures. Dan: could the entry door from the family dressing room to the pool <br />area swing both ways? Kathy: we could look into this. Lisa: motion to approve <br />these proposed amenities was accepted. <br />2. General Updates — Kathy <br />• Golf Updates — GM Position Hiring Update — Kathy <br />Initial interviews were done on Zoom. Four candidates were called back for in <br />person interviews and then toured the Golf Course. We are happy with the four <br />finalists. Michele: we never heard back on our feedback to include RAB in the <br />interview process, etc. Lisa: this is a similar sentiment from all Boards. It appears <br />we are being ignored. Kathy: the RAB should address this concern in its <br />presentation to the City Council. We expect a decision on this position by next <br />week when Adam is back. <br />Dick: I'm concerned about the City's (i.e., Ryder's) lack of response on the use of <br />enterprise funds (e.g., loans). There has been no follow up. It appears we have <br />to wait for the City Manager to address this. <br />