Laserfiche WebLink
LMC Sec. 17.72.030 lists the minimum content of a GDP: <br />A. The proposed use of all lands within the subject property; <br />B. The type or character of development and the number of dwelling <br />units per gross acre proposed; [emphasis added] <br />C. The proposed location of school sites, parks, open spaces, recreation <br />facilities and other public and quasi -public facilities; <br />D. The proposed location of all streets shall be coordinated with the <br />adopted general street plan for the city. <br />Subsection B requires that the GDP establish design standards custom to the planned <br />community zone district, which must also include yard and bulk standards since those <br />define the character of development. However, the adopted standards may not reflect <br />that actual intended character of the development due to the restrictions of Sec. <br />17.72.190 that requires "general conformance" with established zoning standards and <br />relies on PUD waivers to determine the character of development through a later <br />process. Consequently, the intent and purpose of the PCZD GDP to establish <br />"contemporary land planning principles and coordinated community design" could be <br />seen in conflict with Sec. 17.72.190. <br />Removing the restrictive language in Sec. 17.72.190 that requires "general <br />conformance" of yard and bulk standards with comparable zoning on a GDP would <br />allow the City to adopt development standards that more comprehensively set the <br />intended character of the district at the time of GDP approval. The primary argument to <br />defer to the future PUD process is that the PUD will provide complete architectural and <br />site plans for the proposed development and any yard and bulk waivers can be <br />considered in the context of the full set of plans. However, design standards and other <br />restrictions can be established as part of a GDP to address site design. For example, a <br />GDP that allows buildings taller than three stories could establish standards for building <br />materials, building step backs and articulations, and define zones or critical view <br />corridors within the GDP area where building height should be treated differently. The <br />subsequent PUD then must be compliant with the design standards. <br />2025 City Council Work Plan <br />The 2025 City Council Work Plan establishes four priorities, and initiatives within each <br />of the four priorities for 2025. Under the Economic Vitality section, City Council has set <br />a priority to initiate targeted code amendments ahead of the Comprehensive Plan <br />update adoption planned for later this year and an anticipated land development code <br />rewrite scheduled to take place after the Comprehensive Plan adoption (see Figure 1 <br />below). Even though this code amendment is not being initiated by the City it could be <br />considered to fall under this section of the 2025 City Council Work Plan. <br />4 <br />