Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> -. <br /> ElKIN [}Jflj@fA&T? <br /> JOHNSON <br /> .~r_._I.=- <br /> Page Two of Eight <br /> December 4, 2006 <br /> addition, depending upon tenant requirements we can strip the loading dock <br /> and service area with 199 spaces thereby providing up to 448 spaces on the <br /> property which equates to a parking ratio of 3.44 spaces per 1,000 SF. The <br /> requested note has been included as General Note 8. <br /> 4. Revise PUD to shift the location of the central access drive, south of <br /> Dogwood Street to be centrally located on the property. Having the access <br /> drive at the intersection may create a confusing traffic movement for the cars <br /> coming south on Dogwood. <br /> Response: The central driveway has been relocated east of Dogwood Street. <br /> 5. The central access drive should be a minimum of28' wide. <br /> Response: Central driveway has been increased to 28' wide. <br /> 6. The proposed parking scheme on the south side of the building extends too <br /> close to the proposed service ramp. The aisle width for parking lots need to <br /> be a minimum of 24' wide. This minimum width is not in compliance near <br /> the service ramp. <br /> Response: Aisle widths have been increased to minimum of 24' for circulation <br /> at future office parking. <br /> 7. PUD and civil plans propose several areas which will incorporate retaining <br /> walls. Please incorporate on the PUD the height of all retaining walls and the <br /> materials of which they will be constructed. Height of retaining walls is <br /> limited to 30" by the IDDSG. <br /> Response: TO Wand BOW elevations have been indicatedfor retaining walls. <br /> Where height exceeds 30" landscape hedges have been provided <br /> 8. Landscaping is generally in conformance with the requirements of the <br /> IDDSG. The review of the plan raises issues of placement rather than <br /> quantities. There is a 27.5' drainage easement along the rear property line and <br /> a 20' access easement and a 15' sanitary easement in the eastern property line. <br /> The IDDSG requires that deciduous trees maintain a separation from utility <br /> easements and sidewalks of5', and 10' for evergreen trees. It is important the <br /> conflicts between landscaping and the utility easements be reconciled prior to <br /> the completion of the public hearing process. Staff recommends that your <br /> civil and landscape team discuss with the Public Works Department the extent <br /> to which these issues may coexist with the understanding that these are private <br />