My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2007 01 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2000-2009 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2007 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2007 01 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:02:06 PM
Creation date
2/6/2007 9:14:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
1A4 1A5
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2007 01 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> - <br /> ETKIN [}Jflj@fA&T? <br /> JOHNSON <br /> ..~r_..I.:II <br /> Page Four of Eight <br /> December 4, 2006 <br /> and numbers for these colors are: <br /> Field: AESTHEnC WHITE (SHERWIN-WILLIAMS SW - 7035) - <br /> formerly "Egret white" SW 2004. <br /> Accentl: BACKDROP (SHERWIN-WILliAMS SW- 7025) - <br /> formerly "Lava" SW 1041. <br /> Accent 2: JAVA (SHERWIN-WILLIANS SW - 6090)- <br /> formerly "Adirondack SW 2020. <br /> 14. The lighting plan seems to be reversed from what is permitted in the IDDSG. <br /> The lighting in the front of the building does not seem to be adequate enough, <br /> especially near the entrances, where the lighting in the rear of the building is <br /> quite bright. <br /> Response: Lighting plan has been modified to reduce the quantity of building <br /> mounted and parking lot poles at the south side of the building and site. <br /> 15. The architectural plan does not show how roof mounted HV AC will be <br /> located. Please add a note to the PUD stating, 'AIl roof mounted HV AC will <br /> have a minimum setback from the building parapet of 20' and shall be painted <br /> to match the dominant base color of the building.' <br /> Response: Requested note has been expanded upon and added to the General <br /> Notes. <br /> 16. The signage proposed on Page 7 of 13 is not consistent with the sign design <br /> standards described in the IDDSG. Please review the sign design <br /> characteristics and revise your design. <br /> Response: A signage variance is being requested asfollows: <br /> IDDSG Re uested Variance <br /> One with 25 SF per face Three at 5 'H x 8 'L each <br /> with provisions to increase (40 SF per face) with <br /> number throughout graphics on two faces. <br /> Ground mounted u t; hts. <br /> Building mounted 18" H, 15 SF per sign, Six at 2' Hx 20'Leach <br /> tenant sign 80 SF per building. with total of 240 SF. <br /> Non-illuminated <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.