Laserfiche WebLink
Howard asked for clarification on the total number of acres involved. He explained that <br />there are two amounts listed in the application, specifically 77.912 acres on the <br />annexation petition versus staff's statement of 77.87 total acres. <br /> <br />Wood replied that the legal description states 77.87 acres. He was uncertain how the <br />acreage of 77.912 was determined. <br /> <br />Howard stated that if the acreage on the legal description is 77.87, he would like to see <br />that amount used throughout the application. He asked for clarification that the properties <br />would be from 1.5 to 1.8 acres. <br /> <br />Blackwood replied that the sites range from one to two acres. She stated that a substantial <br />number of the lots are one-acre in size. <br /> <br />Howard asked for the distance between Dillon Road and the proposed internal loop road. <br /> <br />Blackwood replied that Dillon Road is approximately 100 feet from the edge of the road, <br />or a fifty-foot setback from the right-of-way. <br /> <br />Howard asked if this distance was in line with what is required for this property. <br /> <br />Wood replied that the underlying setbacks are in excess of what is provided for in the <br />Planned Community Zone District - Residential, however, the distance is in line with the <br />requirements for a Restricted Rural Residential Zone. <br /> <br />Mayer requested that the City Attorney determine who owns the Dillon Street right-of- <br />way, as there appears to be some confusion. He agreed with Howard that the total acreage <br />for the property should be consistent throughout the application. He questioned the <br />proposed Planned Community Development - Residential zoning and suggested that <br />Restricted Rural Residential zoning would be more appropriate. He explained that <br />Restricted Rural Residential Zoning requires, on average, one house per five acres, <br />however, he felt that Council could change that if desired. He encouraged the applicant to <br />determine the best location for a trail that could connect into the current trail system. He <br />stated that he has not seen Jack Bowes' offer to purchase the Admor development rights, <br />therefore, it would be difficult to comment on it. He asked for clarification that the funds <br />for any development rights sold from the Admor property would be split 50/50 with <br />Boulder County. <br /> <br />Simmons replied, yes. <br /> <br />Mayer questioned whether the intent is to construct houses with footprints of 11,000 to <br />18,000 square feet, as the current wording of the proposal would appear to imply. He <br />suggested that the applicant re-phrase this to remove any confusion. <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />