My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2011 04 14
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2011 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2011 04 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:20 AM
Creation date
8/16/2011 2:12:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCMIN 2011 04 14
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 14, 2011 <br />Page 11 of 13 <br /> <br />McMillan stated the zoning will not change the practices already in place by the <br />Parks and Recreation Department. <br />Brignull discussed the weed management plan and when chemicals are used. <br />Loo referenced page 50, Section 4 regarding possible wording that is in conflict <br />with the City Charter. <br />Planning Commission Comments: <br />None heard. <br />Staff Comments <br /> <br />Update regarding the McCaslin & Washington pedestrian crossing <br /> <br />Russ led the discussion by use of power point presentation. <br />Purpose and need statement: To create a functional intersection with a <br /> <br /> <br />more inviting pedestrian crossing which enables motorists and pedestrians <br />to make safer decisions while strengthening the physical connection <br />between Davidson Mesa Open Space and Harper Lake, two of the City’s <br />most cherished amenities. <br />Briefly reviewed the different alternatives. <br /> <br /> <br />Explained the Review Criteria for each alternative. <br /> <br /> <br />Loo asked how the public comment period would be handled. <br />Lipton asked questions about the options/alternatives. <br />Sheets asked if there is a clear favorite at this time. <br />Russ stated there is not a clear favorite <br />Sheets stated she thinks the underpass is the most viable answer. She stated <br />the traffic circle in Superior is scary. <br />Russ reminded the commission that the roundabout might feel scary but it is <br />doing the job of calming traffic as a roundabout is designed to do. <br />Loo asked if a pedestrian count had been completed. <br />Russ stated it had not been done but it is well known how heavily this <br />intersection has become. <br />Loo stated the project could be a lot of tax payer money and the City should have <br />the scientific proof to back up the cost. <br />Stevens discussed the desirability of Davidson Mesa and the fact it might be a <br />desirable location for an underpass. <br />Lipton stated on the CU campus an underpass is not widely used. <br />Russ stated the line of sight is a very important issue with the use of an <br />underpass. <br />Lipton inquired about the use of flashing lights. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.