Laserfiche WebLink
Preliminary PUD and Plat July 7, 2011 <br />th <br />96 and Dillon <br />stopped at the railroad tracks, despite the existing historic patterns indicating otherwise, existing <br />culverts carried water under the tracks, and the track beds are somewhat porous as well. <br />Currently, there is a 12” pipe under the railroad tracks at this low point that is collected in the <br />CTC system and conveyed with their drainage to the east. Also, the railroad track embankment <br />is not impervious and drainage would migrate through the embankment and into the CTC <br />property. There is also a private irrigation ditch lateral group that has indicated the surface <br />runoff that is tributary to the railroad tracks continues underground and emerges in existing <br />laterals east of the CTC. The CTC essentially ignored the offsite basin in its entirety at any level <br />or capacity. <br />The City of Louisville enacted an Outfall System Plan in 1982. This plan acknowledged the <br />runoff from this area and that the CTC did not include a conveyance through its property and in <br />the historical route. That OSP anticipated development on the lands west of these parcels with a <br />reduced runoff rate based on standard mitigation practices. That property is now open space, so <br />the historic runoff will be the prevailing design parameter and the historic runoff is typically at a <br />greater peak and lesser volume than the mitigated runoff. The OSP indicated acceptance of the <br />offsite runoff and conveyance in a pipe through these parcels and to the intersection of Dillon <br />Road and the BNSF, which is the southeast corner of the Church ownership. <br />th <br />In the mid 2000’s, the City reconstructed 96 Street and Dillon Road along the frontage of this <br />th <br />site. As part of that project, the City designed and installed drainage pipes under 96 Street that <br />have in part dictated the design of these parcels drainage outfall and collection systems. There <br />are now two needed drainages that impact this site as opposed to the one in the OSP. The second <br />th <br />outfall occurs at the intersection of 96 and Dillon Road where there are now buried pipes for <br />future connection or extension. The development will allow for the acceptance and conveyance <br />th <br />of the runoff from these two locations through the parcels and to the intersection of 96 and <br />Dillon Road. The main central outfall will route under the main access Road B in a large pipe <br />and will be routed through the site drainage mitigation pond. The other outfall along Dillon <br />Road will be an open channel, except where it is crossed by the Church site access from Dillon <br />Road. Since this channel only conveys offsite runoff and is not necessary or required for the <br />development, we are proposing that this area, which will be in an Outlot, be dedicated to the City <br />and counted as land dedication. <br />The downstream drainage system now starts at the recent phase of the CTC as an open channel <br />and small pipe. The drainage system does not extend any further to the west from that point at <br />this time. <br />In order to meet the City requirements, a runoff mitigation pond will be introduced into the <br />project in the area of open fields on the Church’s parcel and north of the southeast corner of the <br />th <br />project. This pond will accommodate the site development, the runoff from the site side of 96 <br />Street and the northern offsite basin. Until the outfall system becomes available, the drainage <br />from this pond will be mitigated, minor storm events conveyed to the drainage outfall on the <br />south side of Dillon Road, and major storms and bypass flows released back into the railroad <br />right of way as it historically has. <br />Page 7 of 10 <br /> <br />