My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2007 04 18
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2007 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2007 04 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:22 PM
Creation date
6/5/2007 10:25:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCMIN 2007 04 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 18, 2007 <br />Page 5 of 6 <br /> <br />Muth noted the Morgan could continue with her request in one of more of the following <br />ways: <br />1. Make a budget request to the City Council to move the cabins as interpretive <br />sites and asking City Council to support a change to the adopted management <br />plan. <br />2. Find alternative funding for the move and maintenance of the cabins and ask for <br />a change to the adopted management plan. <br />3. Find a site for the cabins other than the Lastoka site. <br /> <br />Muckle noted that the management plan can be changed with the approval,!!/ <br />owning parties. ' <br /> <br /> <br />Morgan noted her desire that they be placed only on the Lastoka sit <br />would be happy to pursue alternative funding and community suppo <br /> <br />Muth noted she will be looking at costs for the move as tool sheds and t t those costs <br />can be the basis for Morgan's fund raising. <br /> <br />Lewis tabled the conversation until then next meeting when st ijuj:lOpes to have more of <br />a cost estimate for the project. <br /> <br />Mine Marker Design <br />Muth noted that she spoke with the Planni <br />would apply to the markers. The signs co <br />mounted and cannot be in the right-of-wa <br />up, the Commission had agreed to work w <br /> <br /> <br />Department about the sign regulations that <br />up to 2 square feet, must be monument <br />dded that when this project first came <br />design with the Historical Commission. <br /> <br />Koertje and Muckle agreed to rep sent the Preservation Commission in those <br />discussions. <br /> <br /> <br />Preservation Zoning Incentives Update - May 10 Planning Commission Review <br />Muth noted that Lewi III be out of town on May 10 for the Planning Commission <br />meeting and asked if er Childs or McMenamin would be able to speak for the <br />Commission. <br /> <br />Childs and <br />the May 1. <br /> <br /> <br />amin will meet with Lewis to get up to speed on the ordinance before <br />tation. <br /> <br />Muth noted tha e ordinance is scheduled to go to City Council for first reading on May <br />15 and second reading and public hearing on June 5. That schedule may be pushed <br />back if the Planning Commission continues it on May 10. <br /> <br />Planning Department Referral - 932 Main Street <br />Members discussed the referral and had the following comments for Muth to forward to <br />the Planning Department. <br /> <br />In general members feel that the character of the proposed building lacks any relation to <br />Old Town. They feel the proposed building is too busy, particularly at the street level. In <br />addition, the building materials do not relate well to the surrounding area. The large <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.