Laserfiche WebLink
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 15, 2011 <br />Page 5of 9 <br />Commission Comments <br />Lewis stated there were a lot of unknowns but the exposed stone shows it matches the <br />existing stone foundation of the house. <br />Fasick added the social history is strong but the architectural integrity is hard to determine <br />because it is covered and might not qualify. <br />Poppitz stated he believed there was enough evidence to show the stone wall is still there. <br />Fasick stated the HPC can landmark a structure based on social history alone. <br />Koertje stated it would be similar to an historical structure with modern siding covering the old <br />siding. <br />Lewis stated she believes the applicant who stated he can see stones within the cracks of the <br />stucco. <br />Tofte asked what would happen if there is a huge section of missing stone. <br />Dressler stated the mason could repair it. He stated the stone is local so finding replacement <br />stone to match would be easy. <br />Fasick asked if the original landmark would have included thiswall would we have approved it. <br />Koertje answered in the affirmative. <br />Lewismoved and Popptizseconded a motion to approve the request as presented by staff. <br />Approval is based on social and architectural integrity. <br />Name Vote <br />Mike KoertjeYes <br />Heather LewisYes <br />Jessica FasickNo <br />Florian Speier Yes <br />Peter Stewartrecused <br />Laurel TofteYes <br />Steve PoppitzYes <br />Motion passed:5 to 1 <br />PUBLIC HEARINGGrantRequest –1117 Jefferson Avenue <br />– <br />McCartney presented the packet material. <br />Koertje asked if staff had a preference of which contractor to use. <br />McCartney answered Olde English. <br /> <br />