My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2000 01 18
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2000 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2000 01 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:45 PM
Creation date
1/30/2004 10:31:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
1/18/2000
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2000 01 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Howard asked for clarification on elimination of licensing for outside businesses. His <br />concern centered on door-to-door sales, which is currently licensed. He asked how the <br />provision would monitor the door-to-door activity. <br /> <br />Finance Director Ray stated that currently they are licensed but not monitored. She <br />stated peddlers and solicitors are different issues, which she hoped to address at a work <br />session in the near future. Under the proposed ordinance they will not be licensed. <br /> <br />Sisk stated that Councilman Keany had asked him to raise the same issue. Sisk asked <br />what provisions now exist that govern door-to-door solicitations. <br /> <br />Finance Director Ray stated that the only provision the current ordinance has is to license <br />those individuals. There are no specific requirements, and that is why this issue needs to <br />be further addressed. <br /> <br />Sisk asked if the issue of door-to-door solicitation should be included in the business <br />license ordinance or separately. <br /> <br />City Attorney Light stated that the door-to-door solicitation should ultimately be dealt <br />within a separate chapter dealing with peddlers, solicitors and transient merchants. <br /> <br />Sisk asked if newspaper delivery persons would be required to obtain business licenses. <br /> <br />City Attorney Light stated that there is an exemption for established delivery routes, or <br />persons calling by appointment. <br /> <br />Sisk asked if the database of business would be utilized for sales tax and for monitoring <br />sales tax. <br /> <br />Finance Director Ray stated that eventually the database would have that capability. <br /> <br />Sisk stated that he did see a need for the change in the business license ordinance. He did <br />not see a benefit to the City. <br /> <br />Howard noted that under Section 5.04.040, G. of the proposed ordinance, there is an <br />exemption for established delivery routes, persons calling by appointment, yard sales, <br />garage sales, events approved by the city, or contractors or temporary uses to extend such <br />contracting activities or temporary uses. He stated that he was also concerned over <br />addressing these licensing issues. He felt that it should have some direct benefit to the <br />citizen, such as licensing door-to-door solicitation. <br /> <br />Davidson asked why the exemption for professional practices was removed. <br /> <br />Finance Director Ray stated that the exemption was removed in order to track the <br />businesses in Louisville. <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.