Laserfiche WebLink
<br />However, testimony and documents before the Council establish that <br />there has been no change in usage of the property or in the <br />contiguous surrounding area since the property was zoned <br />Industrial. <br /> <br />d. No public interest is served in rezoning the <br />property from Industrial to Single Family Estate. One effect of <br />the rezoning would be to place many more single family homes <br />adjacent to other City Industrial zoned property located to the <br />west of the property. <br /> <br />e. There has been no "development" of the area, and so <br />"redevelopment" of the area is inapplicable. <br /> <br />f. The Industrial zoning of the property is consistent <br />with the terms and conditions of the Mizel Annexation Agreement. <br /> <br />g. The applicant did not demonstrate that the land to <br />be rezoned was zoned in error or, as presently zoned, is <br />inconsistent with the policies and goals of Louisville's <br />comprehensive plan. The proposed rezoning is not consistent with <br />policies within the Comprehensive Development Plan update for the <br />City of Louisville, dated May 1975, which designates the subject <br />parcel as industrial, and further states the area is intended to <br />provide for industrial development to achieve the goals set forth <br />therein. <br /> <br />h. Further, the applicant did not demonstrate that the <br />proposed rezoning is consistent with the following goals and <br />policies of the South Sub-Area Comprehensive Plan, as amended on <br />July 5, 1994: <br /> <br />(1) Land Use policy Two, which states "new development <br />should protect the neighborhood character of annexed and adjoining <br />Boulder County Subdivisions." The Maple Grove Subdivision <br />immediately to the east of the property is fully developed with <br />generally five-acre lots. The proposed one-acre lot sizes proposed <br />by the Applicant for the Single Family Estate zoning are not <br />consistent with the established rural residential character. <br />Approval of the proposed rezoning and the residential development <br />of this property would create a residential pocket that does not <br />relate to the surrounding land uses or the community as a whole. <br /> <br />(2) Land Use policy Four, which states "development <br />patterns should be planned in anticipation of constraints and <br />benefits associated with the alignment and location of existing and <br />future public facilities and infrastructure." The applicant has <br />not anticipated the impacts relative to the Northwest Parkway <br />alignment requirements. Dillon Road is indicated as an arterial <br />roadway in the Comprehensive Plan, and has been discussed as a <br />possible location for the proposed Northwest Parkway. Although the <br />Northwest Parkway Intergovernmental Agreement is no long in force, <br /> <br />2 <br />