Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 5, 2005 <br />Page 4 of 12 <br /> <br />Alternatives #1 and #2 are located east of the Recreation Center driveway. <br />Alternative #2 has an enhanced median area on the north side of Via Appia. He <br />estimated the cost of either Alternative #1 or #2 to be approximately $27,000 due <br />to sidewalk work involved. Alternative #3 involves less sidewalk work, but is <br />approximately 400 feet from the Recreation Center entrance. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Phare commented that either Alternative #1 or #2 meets <br />the immediate need of getting the public safely across Via Appia. <br /> <br />Mayor Sisk requested public comment. <br /> <br />Paul Everett, 301 Van Buren Court, Louisville, CO noted with the new Skate <br />Park, there will be increased pedestrian crossing. He asked if the there was any <br />consideration given to placing the crossing between the Recreation Center and <br />the Skate Park. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Phare explained the pedestrian crossings in Alternatives <br />#1 or #2 would connect to the trail system. <br /> <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br /> <br />Council member Marsella inquired as to the current bike path north of Via Appia <br />connection to the pedestrian crossing. Mr. Woolfall stated the current bike path <br />is higher than the pedestrian crossing and would have to be leveled out. He <br />explained bike traffic would be slowed down to enter into the pedestrian crossing. <br /> <br />Council member Keany voiced his concern over the safety with Alternative #3. <br />He favored Alternative #2. <br /> <br />Council member Van Pelt noted the crossing at Alternative #1 and #2 would be <br />utilized more. She voiced her preference to Alternative #2. She asked if <br />Alternative #2 would impact the bike paths. Mr. Woolfall stated the median could <br />be enlarged without impacting the bike lane or traffic lanes. <br /> <br />Council member Brown suggested consideration of options such as painting or <br />signage to give advance warning to motorists. <br /> <br />Council member Levihn voiced his preference for Alternative #2 for the safety of <br />the pedestrians. <br /> <br />Council member Keany inquired as to the pedestrian crossing at Canyon & 10th <br />Street in Boulder and noted it appears to have grooves throughout the crossing. <br />He asked if that could be a consideration. Woolfall stated they are referred to a <br />rumble strips, and could be a consideration. <br />