My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2005 08 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2005 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2005 08 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:41:46 PM
Creation date
11/10/2005 2:22:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
8/2/2005
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2005 08 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 2, 2005 <br />Page 12 of 14 <br /> <br />Commission also removed the Open Space designation on the two westerly lots <br />based on the existing entitlements for the property. The property as noted above <br />has fully met it public use dedication obligation under the existing plat/PUD <br />approval. With the shift in land use designation, the Planning Commission <br />reduced the initial density from 60 units to 17 residential units, which is an <br />increase of 7 units over the existing final PUD. <br /> <br />Council member Van Pelt recused herself from the discussions on Area #7. <br /> <br />Council member Marsella did not favor the proposal for the housing options for <br />Opportunity Area #7. She preferred open space on the west side of McCaslin. <br /> <br />Council member Brown favored preserving the gateway and open space by <br />lowering the density on the east side of McCaslin Blvd. <br /> <br />Mayor Sisk stated 45 housing units on the property are too many. He preferred <br />the Urban Estates zoning, which would provide for 17 homes. He noted there <br />are traffic issues at the intersection of McCaslin and South Boulder Road. <br /> <br />Council member Levihn agreed and noted there have been developers who have <br />tried to develop the corner of McCaslin and South Boulder Road and failed. <br /> <br />Mayor Sisk requested public comment. <br /> <br />Ty Gee, 255 Hoover Court, Louisville, CO voiced his concern over the use of the <br />term flexibility. He stated the point of the Comprehensive Plan is to capture the <br />citizen's vision for the City. He noted there is a problem with the Comprehensive <br />Plan providing too much flexibility. <br /> <br />There was Council discussion relative to preserving the west side of McCaslin. <br />Council member Brown suggested a principle be written to preserve the west <br />side of McCaslin. There was Council consensus. <br /> <br />Mayor Sisk stated the residential phasing plan be discussed on August 16. <br /> <br />Mayor Sisk requested Council discussion on population ranges. The Council's <br />preference for a population range was as follows: Mayor Sisk: 23,000 to 24,000; <br />Council member Marsella requested the range be a goal or a vision. Council <br />members: Keany: 1 to 23,000; Clabots: 19,080 to 22,000. Council member <br />Brown stated not knowing the future it is difficult to project a range. He estimated <br />his vision range from 22,000 to 23,000. Council member Van Pelt concurred with <br />Council member Brown's comments, and voiced a preference for an approximate <br />range of 22,000 to 24,000. Council member Levihn favored the Planning <br />Commission projected population of 23,000. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.