My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2012 02 13
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2012 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2012 02 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:15 PM
Creation date
2/10/2012 11:23:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2012 02 13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 19, 2011 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />Lewis added design assistance also acts as the facilitator or consultant for the applicant. <br />Loo appreciated the clarification.She asked if Ms. Hoffman’s project is unique. <br />McCartney answered yes and added this project has been under HPC review for almost a <br />year. <br />Commission Comments <br />Poppitz stated he would like to help Stewart on the design assistance. <br />Koertje recommended a continuation ofthe item until a design alternative is determined. <br />Stewartmade a motion to continue this request for more information. Koertjeseconded the <br />motion. <br />Name Vote <br />Mike KoertjeYes <br />Heather LewisYes <br />Jessica FasickYes <br />Florian Speier Yes <br />Peter StewartYes <br />Steve PoppitzYes <br />Motion passed:6 to 0 <br />Discussion – Demo Code Update <br />McCartney presented the memo and explained why City Council continued this item. <br />Stewart stated the primary intent for continuation was to provide a comparison between <br />the existing process and the proposed process. <br />Discussion – January and February meeting dates <br />McCartney stated alternative dates would need to be chosen for January and February <br />due to holidays. He presented alternative dates shown on attached memo. <br />thth <br />After a brief discussion the HPC chose January 9and February 13and the <br />alternative meeting dates. <br />Update – 2012 CLG Grant <br />McCartney presented the memo and explained what the CLG Grant was for. <br />The HPC appreciated the work and the update. <br />Committee Reports – none <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.