City Council Minutes 2000 09 05 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Louisville City Council Meeting September 5, 2000 Page 14. new PUD for Lot 13 and amend the existing PUD for Lots 14 and 15, which is under the same ownership. Wood reviewed the applicant's requests that the City vacate its interest in the entire 60'wide public access easement and that if an alternate 30' access easement is desired by the City, that it be designated as an emergency access only. Wood noted that additional conditions have been added to Resolution No. 45, one of which requires the applicant to initiate and successfully vacate the 60'wide access easement prior to the issuance of a building permit for Lot 13. This is required due to the encroachment of the proposed Lot 13 building footprint into the easement. Wood noted an added condition to the Resolution relating to the plating issue. The applicant has agreed to the condition of entering into a covenant agreement, and removing the proposed property line for the Final PUD plan. Another added condition of approval requires that the secondary access be reconstructed prior to the foundation inspection for Lot 13, Block 4. Wood stated that an agreement has been reached with O'Connor Development, which has taken over the management role for the CTC Filing I Property Owners Association, to administer the long term maintenance of the access easement through billing of the affected property owners. The seven affected property owners will share the cost associated with maintenance. Wood stated that the applicant is willing to pay for the cost of grading and resurfacing of access easement in accordance with the direction of the Fire District. Davidson asked if there was a signed, enforceable agreement on the construction and maintenance of the access. Wood replied no. Davidson called for Applicant presentation. Paul R. Pennock, Zeiler-Pennock, Inc. 2727 Bryant Street, Suite 600, Denver, CO, Architect representing the McBride Brothers, stated that the applicant is willing to accept the conditions set forth in Resolution No. 45. He stated that he is available to address Council questions. COUNCIL QUESTIONS Keany asked Planning Director Wood why the City was asking for a 30' easement. Keany recalled Council discussion that the easement would not be required if the Hoyle property was not annexed. Wood stated that he did not believe there was specific direction to remove that condition. 14