Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />September 5, 2000 <br />Page 28. <br /> <br />building. He noted that the same subdivision obligations still apply and that a <br />Development Agreement will be executed which restates the Subdividers obligations. <br /> <br />Wood stated that the architecture proposed is unique for Louisville outside of the <br />downtown core district. The design, as proposed by the applicant, is a modem <br />interpretation of the City's mining heritage. The applicant proposes utilizing both <br />concrete block and wood siding as primary building elements. The building incorporates <br />design features that borrow from the conveyor systems of old mining shafts. <br /> <br />Wood noted that the Planning Commission discussed the possibility that a few of the <br />proposed architectural elements are thematic in nature and strongly discouraged by the <br />CDDSG. He noted that the elevation has been modified to remove some of the stronger <br />thematic elements, with respect to a large tower and pulley. The height of the tallest <br />portion of the building is 35-feet, compared to Lehrer's 26-foot building height. He <br />noted that the Planning Commission supported the wood siding. <br /> <br />Wood stated that the signage is similar with the Lehrer's proposal. One building <br />mounted sign is provided on the north elevation, mounted to the canopy. It would consist <br />of individual pan channel letters, similar to the monument signs. The sign area is 33 <br />square feet. Wood noted that these types of facilities can often be noisy, however, the <br />City does not have a noise ordinance. Therefore, state statutes regulate noise in the City. <br /> <br />Wood noted that Resolution No. 55, Series 2000, has five conditions of approval. <br /> <br />Davidson called for Applicant presentation. <br /> <br />Eric Hartkronft, Hartronft-Fauri Architects, 801 Main Street, Louisville, CO, stated that <br />he is the architect for the project, representing Rachel Gerdty. He noted that this is Ms. <br />Gerrity's first full service car wash venture. He introduced Bill Blair, who represents the <br />manufacturer of the car wash equipment and who will answer any questions relative to <br />the decibel ratings or water quality. He summarized the project and stated that he felt the <br />architecture elements are appropriate to the area. <br /> <br />Carrie DeGraw, 741 Orchard Drive, Louisville, CO, stated that she knows the applicant <br />Rachel Gerrity. She stated her belief that the architecture is appropriate for the area, and <br />noted that the proposed car wash project would be a water conservation measure for the <br />City. She summarized by saying that the car wash would be a real asset to the City and <br />urged the Council to approve the proposal. <br /> <br />Mayer congratulated Hartkronft for his architectural design. He voiced his concern about <br />the headlights of cars in the car wash spilling out onto South Boulder Road. Hartronft <br /> <br />28 <br /> <br /> <br />