My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2000 09 19
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2000 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2000 09 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:46 PM
Creation date
2/2/2004 11:56:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
9/19/2000
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2000 09 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />September 19, 2000 <br />Page 13. <br /> <br />Wood reviewed Ordinance No. 1345, Series 2000, which if approved, would zone the <br />property Single Family Low Density. <br /> <br />Wood noted that Staff and the City Attorney's office have reviewed the petition and map <br />and find them, as revised, to be in compliance with statutory requirements. The property <br />has 100% contiguity with the City, as it is an unincorporated enclave within the City of <br />Louisville. The property is currently occupied by one single family home and associated <br />out buildings. <br /> <br />Sisk asked about the recorded Warranty Deed. <br /> <br />City Attorney Light reviewed that the annexation map includes a strip of land identified <br />with a note, "Note carried or occupied by Fischer." Light stated that Staff investigated <br />the ownership and that the first information suggested a county right-of-way, established <br />by county road petition in the early 1900's. Under the annexation law, a signature would <br />not be required for annexation. Light stated that the Title Company determined the right- <br />of-way was abandoned and is or was owned by a private party. John Prouty is the private <br />party and has conveyed the ownership of the strip of land in question, through a recorded <br />Warranty Deed, and therefore, the petitioner does have ownership of all the areas being <br />annexed. <br /> <br />Sisk asked Light if the first representation of ownership of that strip of land is a defect in <br />the petition for annexation. <br /> <br />Light stated that the first representation of ownership was made at the time of the <br />Resolution of Eligibility. He stated that if the person who owns the land, Mr. Prouty, has <br />conveyed it to the petitioner, the only one who has the ability to object to the annexation <br />would be the County. <br /> <br />Davidson called for Applicant presentation. <br /> <br />Stephen Sparn, of Stephen Spare & Associates PC, 1731 15~h Street, Boulder, CO, stated <br />that he is the Principal Architect for the project, representing the petitioner, JoBelle <br />Fischer. He addressed the strip of land in question, which was titled to John Prouty. He <br />noted that at the time of the annexation petition, the Fischer's believed that they had <br />ownership of the land in question. When the boundary survey was completed, there was <br />a technical error and Mr. Prouty has since signed a Warranty Deed to the property over to <br />Mrs. Fischer. He noted that the strip of land is 16' wide, 329' long and encompassed by <br />the Fischer's fence. <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.