My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2012 01 12
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2012 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2012 01 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:30:12 AM
Creation date
5/10/2012 11:37:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2012 01 12
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
686
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Staff Report <br />January 12, 2012 <br />transportation,vehicles, transit, bicycles, and pedestrians of all ages and abilitieswithin <br />a contextual street design that is compatible with its surrounding land uses.Specific <br />design features of this street type are not currently withinthe City’s street design <br />regulations. <br />The street cross sections on page 8 of 18 show how the livable ROW will be designed <br />for multi-modal purposes. Unique and challenging aspects of this street include: <br />11’ travel lanes <br />5’ Extruded gutter pan bike lanes <br />6’ Sidewalk <br />Parkway (Tree Lawn) <br />Substandard curve radii (below 150-feet (25 mph)) <br />An objective to this living street is to calm (slow) traffic speeds to enable a shared street <br />environment. In principal, the City supports the intent of the street’s design. However, in <br />its current layout, the street creates challenging ongoing safety and maintenance <br />concerns for the City. <br />The City does not accept proposed streets which do not conform to City Design and <br />Construction Standards. In this case the right of way width is under 50’; the flow line <br />dimension (curb face to curb face) varies from 24’ to 40’ and not consistent with the local <br />street standardof 36’; walks are provided on only one side of the street; and the <br />centerline curve radius at Luke Street and Steel Street intersection is under 150’. <br />Therefore,the City will not accept proposed ROW and street widths for Steel Street and <br />Luke Streetas part of thispreliminary submittal. <br />The City is willing to continue to work with the applicant to determine an acceptable <br />alternative ROW and street design dimensions prior to final submittal. <br />As proposed, the turning radiusthe intersection of Steel Street to Luke Street,along with <br />ROW dimensions do not meet City Standards. The applicant and Public Works <br />Department havedetermined a roundabout, or similardesign,could be considered at <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.