My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2012 05 21
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2012 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2012 05 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:16 PM
Creation date
5/18/2012 10:33:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2012 05 21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 19, 2012 <br />Page 7 of 12 <br />Lewis – I think we want to keep this structure standing up and I find it hard to understand why <br />we would not want to make sure the roof is structurally sound. <br />Stewart – According to the structural engineer this structural is at risk ofcollapsing if a natural <br />event, such as a large snow storm, were to occur. <br />Janice – I believe the engineer had stated a 40 MPH wind or 4 inches of snow could injure this <br />roof. <br />Lewis – I believe we should make a recommendation to Council and explain why this project <br />should go forward. If you look at the scope of this project the vast majority isthe structural <br />component, so there isn’t much more to be done to reduce this cost. <br />Stewart – I agree. <br />McCartney – we will include in our staff report an analysis onhow the HPC wants the full <br />amount to be carried forward. <br />La Grave – what is the total sum of the previous grants. <br />Stewart read from the staff report. It is about $14,919. <br />McCartney – we will double check our numbers before we carry it forward. <br />Lewis madea motion recommend approval of the grant amount, as presented, to stabilize the <br />roof because the structure is a landmarked residence. The request includes $12,800 plus a <br />20% contingency (as recommended by staff). <br />Fasick seconded the motion. <br />Stewart – themotion should include this is a life safety concern. <br />Lewis agreed. <br />Name Vote <br />Mike KoertjeYes <br />Heather LewisYes <br />Jessica FasickYes <br />Florian Speier Absent <br />Aquiles La GraveAbstain <br />Peter StewartYes <br />Steve PoppitzAbsent <br />Motion passed:4to 0 <br />McCartney asked if the agenda could be modified to allow the applicant from 801 <br />Walnut Street to speak before the Comprehensive Plan – Visioning. <br />Stewart agreed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.