My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Summary 2012 05 08
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Study Sessions
>
2012 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Summary 2012 05 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:49:08 AM
Creation date
6/20/2012 11:05:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Supplemental fields
Test
SSSUM 2012 05 08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Study Session Summary <br />May 8, 2012 <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />City Manager Fleming commented that on the slide showing the list of where the <br />signs will be installed; there are 6 signs in downtown all within a 2 block area. Is <br />this overkill? Sean replied that if it appears that way it can be adjusted. <br />Councilmember Keany commented that the directional signs during the summer <br />will direct drivers to areas closed off for Street Faire (staff's opinion was that this <br />would not be a problem for the short term) and there should be directional signs <br />indicating RTD stops. <br />Councilmember Yarnell votes for the solid teal color for the parking identification <br />signs. <br />Councilmember Keany asked for research to be done as to who bought the <br />current wayfinding signs, DBA or the City? If DBA bought the original signs they <br />may want to sell them. <br />Director Russ said that wayfinding planning for the other districts in the City have <br />been submitted as a CIP. The goal here is to start to implement the plan <br />incrementally across the City. <br />Public comment: <br />• Do all lots have accessible parking spots? There should be signs at the <br />lots that do have accessible parking. Planner McCartney said he would <br />work with Public Works on this. <br />Update /Discussion — Snow Removal Policy <br />Presenter: Kurt Kowar <br />At the City Council January 10, 2012 strategic planning retreat, Council identified <br />an improved Snow Removal Policy as a high priority. As a response, Public <br />Works experimented with different approaches and additional levels of service <br />during the snow storms that followed to provide snow removal service, and staff <br />was able to measure and identify costs associated with different options. In <br />response, Director Kowar presented statistics from the past three snow seasons <br />(2009/2010 through 2011/2012) to show costs associated for the snowfall <br />amounts for this time period. <br />Based on the information acquired from experimenting with different approaches, <br />staff estimates that adding residential snow removal routes will cost an additional <br />$500 to $800 per snow event. Currently, the City's snow removal policy allows <br />for all streets to be plowed only in a Category IV snowstorm (12 or more inches). <br />For the cost analysis, staff assumed that for a Category I (0 -2 inches) snow <br />removal would not be required. The cost based upon review of the last 3 years <br />of snowfall events to service Category !land 111 storms per year would range from <br />$3,500 to $5,600. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.