Laserfiche WebLink
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 16, 2012 <br />Page 8 of 9 <br /> <br />Fasick - maybe this is a New Deal project. I can research this. At the most we should <br />photo document this structure. <br />Lewis - also, if saving is not possible, maybe we could save the materials for future use. <br />821 McKinley <br />Robinson presented the item regarding the subcommittee review. The permit was <br />released due to lack of integrity. <br />Lewis - I was one of the committee members. It did not have a strong social history and <br />the structure had been modified over time. We felt it would not be eligible based on our <br />criteria. <br />1116 Jefferson <br />Robinson presented the item giving the HPC a heads up of this upcoming demo review. <br />He reminded the HPC this property had gone before the HPC a few years ago and it <br />was released. <br />Grain Elevator <br />Robinson presented this item and informed them of the RFP. <br />Stewart - La Grave and I have spoken with the owner’s rep. There is a meeting <br />scheduled on 4/20 with staff, Faisck, Stewart and the State to talk about incentives that <br />might be available. We are trying to pinpoint the liability effect that was discussed by <br />the owner’s rep so we thought we would research how much it would be for the City to <br />take over liability expense. <br />Koertje - is CPI going to be involved in this meeting. <br />Stewart - not at this meeting but they would like to be kept up to date. <br />John Leary - Colorado Historical Foundation has funding options as well. <br />801 Walnut <br />Robinson presented the item explaining how the structure had advanced to a full demo. <br />The contractor stated the structure was accidently demolished but it was not structurally <br />advanced to be saved. He showed the proposed elevations as submitted for building <br />permit. <br />Stewart - Poppitz and I worked on the subcommittee and were fairly upset the structure <br />was removed. We hope the building department was aware and that a shoring plan <br />should have been included at time of permit. <br /> <br />