My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Open Space Advisory Board 2006
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
OPEN SPACE ADVISORY BOARD
>
2000-2019 Open Space Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
2006 Open Space Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Open Space Advisory Board 2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 8:21:19 AM
Creation date
10/15/2012 10:56:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
OSAB 2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
0 <br />Open Space Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />July 12, 2006 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />John Watt asked how do we find out if there are other funds available to <br />purchase this property? Scott Robson addressed this and indicated that there is <br />not even a willing seller at this point. <br />Phil Harbor indicated that this property is a natural extension of Cottonwood and <br />asked why it was a low priority. Jeff Moline drew the distinction between park <br />property and open space property. <br />Who drafts a proposal if there is a willing seller? <br />Scott Robson indicated that the City Planning Department is the gatekeeper of <br />land development. <br />Jerry Stroup spoke about the safety issues. Bike accidents and car accidents <br />already are occurring. Fire issues should be considered. Who will be paying for <br />the infrastructure. <br />Gaylen Olsson asked how much money is available for parks. Scott Robson <br />indicated that there is approximately $3 million currently available to purchase <br />parks and open space <br />OJohn indicated that we should make it a high priority, go before the planning <br />commission and the city council to explain the importance of this property. <br />The Board deliberated on the issue. <br />Tom Davinroy indicated that he is open to revisiting the prioritization list, and in <br />particular looking at this parcel in that regard. He thanked the neighbors for <br />inviting us out to look at the property. <br />Bret asked about reprioritization and whether we could do it tonight or not. <br />Ted indicated that he would be open to revisiting the prioritization list, and in <br />particular looking at this parcel in that regard. He thanked the neighbors for <br />inviting us out to look at the property. <br />Kate indicated that she would like additional information and asked Staff to do <br />some additional work and come back to this issue at an upcoming meeting. <br />David thanked the public for coming. He expressed sympathy with their <br />viewpoints. Change is not easy and can be painful. He indicated that he would <br />have trouble with jumping into the fray and telling the landowners that they <br />shouldn't have the right to do what they want with their property. He does not <br />believe that this area needs additional parks or open space. However, he <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.