Laserfiche WebLink
2. Davidson Mesa Trail Configuration Discussion — Cindy Lair opened the discussion of <br />this agenda item with an overview of the management plan designations and existing <br />status of trails on the Mesa and a summary of recent LOSCAB and City Staff discussions <br />about potential reconfigurations. <br />One area of particular concern on the Mesa is the northwest segment (bordering the <br />Paragon neighborhood) which is currently designated Preserve and Protect, but features a <br />significant undesignated social trail running from the Davidson Ditch up the slope and <br />connecting to the western edge of the dogs off -leash area. Ms. Lair and Mr. Jones noted <br />that an inventory completed in Dec. 2001 by Esco Associates noted that the rare grasses <br />present in the northern segment make it "an important remnant," and "invite the greatest <br />degree of protection..." <br />Esco also recommended that "future management should avoid intrusion of regular <br />human disturbance into this limited resource." <br />It was noted that the LOSCAB was considering the closure of the above mentioned social <br />trail because of the Preserve status and the steep slope of the northwest facing hillside. <br />At previous LOSCAB meetings, trail reconfiguration discussions have included possible <br />closures of various social trails and the extension of the main "crusher fine" trail to create <br />a figure -8 perimeter trail. One potential configuration for the perimeter'trail would <br />extend north from the western end of the existing crusher fine to run along the southern <br />and eastern edges of the Panorama and Paragon neighborhoods, respectively. The trail <br />would then veer to the northeast, running along the ridge of the slope until it connected <br />with the western edge of the dog off -leash area. <br />Ms. Lair stressed that there were no plans to "close down" the entire Mesa as some <br />members of the public seemed to believe had been recommended. <br />Mr. Jones then opened the discussion to comments from the public: <br />f <br />Rob Scott, Louisville resident — Mr. Scott strongly disagreed with the "Preserve" <br />designation of the northern segment of the Davidson Mesa and argued against the closure <br />of the east -west social trail that runs down the slope in the Preserve section. Mr. Scott <br />suggested the fact that the trail had been use for 10+ years with no damage to the <br />surrounding area indicates that a Visitor status designation for the area would be <br />appropriate. Mr. Scott said his wife, an ecologist, would volunteer to work with the city <br />to create an education and awareness campaign to help ensure that people stayed on the <br />path. He then made the point that the northern part of the Mesa was considered a "jewel" <br />within the Open Space system and that, as such, it should be left open and accessible to <br />be enjoyed by all, rather than locked away and out of sight. <br />*Secretary's Note — Several subsequent speakers voiced their agreement with Mr. Scott <br />and made very similar comments or elaborated on his points. In the interest of brevity <br />