My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Open Space Advisory Board 2003
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
OPEN SPACE ADVISORY BOARD
>
2000-2019 Open Space Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
2003 Open Space Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Open Space Advisory Board 2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 8:21:18 AM
Creation date
10/16/2012 2:13:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
OSAB 2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
and clarity, these speakers will be designated in these notes with an asterisk and the <br />• notes will address only those comments that were additive to Mr. Scott's. <br />Russell Moore, Louisville resident* — Voiced support for Mr. Scott's views and <br />maintained that he was strongly opposed to the closing of the perimeter trail. <br />Jeff Andringa; Louisville resident* — Mr. Andringa said that he is a "heavy user" of the <br />Mesa and hasn't seen people off -trail or otherwise misusing the Mesa. <br />Tom Green, Louisville resident* — Mr. Green said that he is also a user of the trail in the <br />Preserve section and hasn't seen any erosion of the surrounding area. He also asked that <br />the social trail in the north area be left open. <br />Virginia Howland, Louisville resident* - Ms. Howland reiterated that she also does not <br />want to see the social trails closed down and suggested that a strong education program <br />was necessary and would appropriate usage. <br />Jay Berger, Louisville resident — Mr. Berger mentioned that he had been closely <br />following the LOSCAB's efforts for three years and had never seen the majority of <br />attendees at a previous meeting. Mr. Berger said he didn't want to see the "personal <br />fitness routines" and convenience take precedence over legitimate preservation concerns. <br />Mr. Berger said we must all be willing to "give a little" in order to preserve what is <br />important and that our culture of consumerism doesn't mean that we need to impose that <br />mentality on our natural resources. Mr. Berger noted that the main "crusher fine" trail is <br />currently the only legitimate trail on the Mesa and that 10 -15 years of illegitimate use of <br />other social trails does not justify continue use in the future. <br />Mr. & Mrs. John Carey — Both commented that they'd like to see a perimeter trail. Mrs. <br />Carey asked if there was any scientific evidence that the social trial running through the <br />Preserve section was actually causing damage. Mrs. Carey also noted the importance of <br />an educational program to encourage proper trail usage. <br />Pam Andringa, Louisville resident* - Ms. Andringa noted that despite the steep slope of <br />the hillside, the trail is actually quite stable except for "two weeks a year" when it is <br />muddy. Ms. Andringa maintained that restricting access (with signs) during those two <br />weeks would provide sufficient protection. She noted the trails at NCAR as evidence that <br />the trails are not too steep. <br />Pam Branum— Ms. Branum noted that dog owners are responsible users of the trails, <br />picking up after their dogs and observing the on -leash restrictions. She also mentioned <br />that some of the "braiding" on the trails occurs when dog owners attempt to keep their <br />dogs away from runners and bikers. <br />Tom Branum — Mr. Branum suggested that he was seeking minimum impact on sensitive <br />areas, but, in general, more access. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.