My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2001 05 22
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2001 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2001 05 22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:47 PM
Creation date
12/2/2003 2:10:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
5/22/2001
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2001 05 22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />May 22, 2001 <br />Page 5 <br />in removing the pole from its location and encouraged Public Service to place the pole as <br />close to the existing structure as possible. <br /> <br />Rick Toray, 746 Pear Court, Louisville, asked Council to consider three things: <br />expectations, status quo and impact. He explained that he might have had incorrect <br />expectations when he moved into the neighborhood, which was that there were not going <br />to be other, bigger poles going in. He stated that when you move into a neighborhood, <br />you expect poles to be where they are, and if the poles are replaced, the replacements <br />should be in a similar location so that they don't impact different neighbors than the <br />previous poles. Secondly, he explained that you expect a certain status quo, specifically, <br />that the poles will either remain where they are or be removed entirely. Lastly, you must <br />consider the impact to the neighborhood. He stated that the current pole location <br />immensely impacts the view that he had prior to the new pole number 39 installed this <br />afternoon. He guessed that moving the pole slightly north would not have the impact on <br />those neighbors that the current location does. <br /> <br />Davidson called for Xcel Energy's presentation. <br /> <br />Michael Diehl, Xcel Energy, 550 15th Street, Denver, explained that he was just at the site <br />where pole number 39 was located. He stated that there appears to be a difference of <br />opinion on whether the new structure was most appropriately located on the south side or <br />the north side of the existing structure. He explained that, after an on-site meeting with <br />the Mayor and neighboring homeowners, Public Service decided in the spirit of <br />cooperation to pull the newly installed pole and to locate it on the north side of the <br />existing structure. He continued that, even now, there is a difference of opinion from <br />residents relative to whether that was a wise move. He explained that all but four <br />structures are set and stated that 'it is time to let it go, allow us to proceed'. He stated that <br />an employee of Public Service lost most of his ring finger during the removal of structure <br />39 this evening. Diehl stated that he is sorry to see it come to this. <br /> <br />The Mayor called for additional public comments. <br /> <br />Jodi Raikes, 733 Orchard Drive, Louisville, thanked the Mayor and Xcel Energy for <br />meeting with the neighbors today and for moving the pole. She agreed that everyone has <br />their opinion on where they would like the pole to be, however, the only fair thing would <br />be to place the pole as close to the existing pole as it can be. <br /> <br />Davidson called for Council comments and questions. <br /> <br />Sisk asked whether pole # 39 could be placed within five feet of its existing location. <br /> <br />Michael Diehl stated that without engineering details, he could not commit to the fact that <br />Xcel can locate the new structure within five feet of the existing structure. He explained <br />that the stake referred to by Mayor Davidson was a guide stake, which was located <br />somewhere between five and ten feet from the existing structure. That was the location <br />that the engineer, off the top of his head, indicated that we might be able to locate the <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.