Planning Commission Minutes 2012 05 10

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 10, 2012 Page 5 of 12 Proposed Yard and Bulk Requirements – Tract 1 Buildings West Setback East South North Building Setback Setback Setback Heights Req Prop Req Prop Req Prop Req Prop Req Prop Existing House 30’ 280’ 15’ 210’ 15’ 580’ 15’ 30’ 35’ 35’ North Bubble 50’ 310’ 35’ 6’ 35’ 440’ 35’ 160’ 35’ 40’ South Bubble 50’ 355’ 35’ 6’ 35’ 325’ 35’ 310’ 35’ 40’ Indoor Clubhouse 50’ 360’ 35’ 15’ 35’ 15’ 30’ 450’ 35’ 40’ & Courts Russ continued with a discussion of the waivers being requested: Building height – 40 feet, Tennis Bubble Setback, Indoor Tennis Court &  Clubhouse setback, Parking spaces, and Sidewalk paralleling Bike Path Outdoor lighting for tennis courts  Landscaping  Russ concluded with a request to approve the final plat and final PUD for the St. Louis Parish and Commercial Park with the following conditions: 1. The plan sheets shall be updated prior to City Council review to indicate 20 spaces of the 69 space southern parking lot shown in Phase 1B (page 17 of 24), shall be moved to Phase 1A. 2. Final approval of the proposed public land dedication and payment-in-lieu of a dedication is subject to a current appraisal and will be determined prior to City Council review. 3. Staff requests the cash in lieu figure be finalized prior to review by City Council. 4. The applicant shall continue to work with Public Works on finalizing details from the April 30, 2012 applicant comment letter. These items should be finalized prior to recordation of Subdivision Agreement. Commission Questions of Staff: Brauneis discussed the lighting of the site. He noted there is a lot of spill onto the roadway and he believes the lighting can be done better. Lipton asked Brauneis for clarification as to whether he is suggesting a change of the fixture or a different photo metric report. Brauneis stated the equipment is not consistent with the photo metric. Russell asked if the City has a ‘dark sky’ ordinance. Russ stated the City does not have a ‘dark sky’ ordinance. He suggested the addition of a condition of approval to address the best practices for lighting and to continue working with staff. Lipton asked Brauneis to write the condition to address the lighting concern. Applicant Presentation: Jim Blankenship, representing the three (3) property owners, briefly reviewed the history of the property ownership and introduced the key personnel for the project.