My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2012 10 25
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2012 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2012 10 25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:21 AM
Creation date
1/31/2013 8:56:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCMIN 2012 10 25
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 25, 2012 <br />Page 9 of 13 <br /> <br />Lipton discussed the elevator shaft at the corner. He requested the applicant <br />consider something different because over time the sun will cause the glass to <br />become cloudy. <br />Pritchard asked how the glass will do with the sun if it is tinted. <br />Mulhern stated they do not use a tinted glass but they do use a Low E. <br />Tengler asked if the proposed Community Room was for all people or just those <br />living in the units. <br />Mulhern stated it was for all. <br />NOTE: <br />Lipton declared a 5 minute break at 8:16 PM. <br />Public Comment <br />Valerie Hackman, 2282 Crown Circle, stated the development does not comply with <br />the Louisville character, there are too many cars planned to be parked on Centennial <br />Drive and the density and height are both too much. <br />Peter Stewart, 1132 Jefferson, stated his concern with facts and issues presented by <br />staff regarding the requested variances and density. He discussed the land area <br />permissible use for residential in the CC zone district. If there is going to be a change <br />in the permissible area for residential then it needs to be included as a variance <br />request. He stated he would like to see more commercial. <br />Devona Sayler, 253 Crown Circle, stated she does not support the project because it <br />is too large and Louisville does not need more residential. <br />Sid Vinall, 544 Leader Circle, stated he would like to see more commercial on the <br />nd <br />ground floor with the apartments starting on the 2 floor. <br />Bill Staton, 2396 McKinley Ave, stated his concern with parking and traffic. He <br />suggested the speed limit on Centennial be reduced from 35 to 25. He also stated his <br />nd <br />support for retail/commercial on the ground floor and apartments on the 2 floor. <br />John Nahodyl, 2333 Dogwood Circle, thanked staff for the cooperation in listening to <br />the citizens group. He stated that change is going to happen but it should work for all <br />concerned parties. He thanked Loftus and Mulhern for recognizing the unique <br />character of Louisville and especially for their encouraging Alfalfa’s be part of this <br />project. <br />Darlene Nahodyl, 2333 Dogwood Circle, stated there needs to be less residential. <br />She asked if there is enough room for the delivery trucks at Alfalfa’s. <br />Drusilla M. Tieben, 2224 Crown Circle, stated four concerns: density and height; <br />architecture not compatible with neighborhood, foot traffic on South Boulder Road <br />and the scraping of the former Safeway site. <br />John Leary, 1116 Lafarge, stated the project has come a long way but it is not there <br />yet. The proposal is not consistent with the Comp Plan. He stated Louisville is not the <br />community to add this type of high density living. He continued with a discussion of <br />the financial analysis and the need for additional facts and figures. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.