My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Business Retention and Development Committee Agenda and Packet 2013 02 04
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUSINESS RETENTION & DEV COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Business Retention and Development Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2013 Business Retention and Development Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Business Retention and Development Committee Agenda and Packet 2013 02 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:09:36 PM
Creation date
2/5/2013 9:22:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BRADPKT 2013 02 04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Main Street Patios <br />On January 17, 2013 staff distributed the attached conceptual design packet to the D <br />anticipation of a meeting on Thursday, January 24, 2013, which w <br />distribution we received some early comments from members who wo <br />attend. Their comments were as follows: <br />The decks need to be 9 deep, not 8. We discussed this at the Council meeting, and <br />thought everyone agreed, but it is not drafted that way <br />No way will there be room for planters inside the patios, especily 8 <br />deep, plus having the planters outside softens their appearancean effect that is lost or <br />reduced by placing planters inside the decks <br />I see no water or electrical hookups or plans for thoseagain, we thought this was <br />promised by Council. <br />The proposed design with the Louisville logo just doesnt fit. <br />They like the top elevation shown on the conceptual design sheet <br />At the Thursday morning meeting 3 members of the DBA were in att <br />Judy Goodson and Jim Tienken. They reiterated the above concern <br />patios were never going to be 9 foot deep. Staff explained the <br />and the new decks are going to be 8 feet deep which gives 2 addi <br />to hear that and apologized for the misinterpretation. The rema of their comments were <br />as follows: <br />They like the simplicity of the elevation shown at the top of th <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Changes to above design: <br />They want IPE handrails and metal end posts with IPE caps. <br />They want hanging platforms designed to allow for the placement of their ex <br />terracotta planters off the sides of the patio railings. Sean prepared a sketch (attached) <br />of what they were thinking of for the City Council packet. They <br />open to the air to allow for airflow which allows the flowers to grow <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.