Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />December 4, 2001 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />Sisk asked Planning Director Wood if there is a request to combine the two lots with the <br />easement. Wood stated that the two lots were connected by Covenant Agreement to be <br />joined for the purpose of building construction. He stated that the vacation of the <br />easement requires an ordinance action. <br /> <br />Sisk asked if the vacation of the easement would endanger the City in terms of utilities or <br />future usage. Wood responded no. <br /> <br />Sisk asked if the vacation of the easement would give more buildable square footage to <br />the lots. Wood responded no. <br /> <br />Davidson called for public comment. Heating none, Davidson closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br />seconded by <br />absent. <br /> <br />Keany moved that Council approve Ordinance No. 1373, Series 2001, <br /> Roll call vote was taken. The motion passed by a vote of 6-0. Howard <br /> <br />ADOPTION OF THE 2002 BUDGET <br /> <br />Davidson called for Staff presentation. <br /> <br />Finance Director Dianne Ray reviewed the three budget resolutions, as amended: <br />Resolution No. 58, Series 2001 - Adoption of the 2002 Budget, Resolution No. 59, Series <br />2001 - Appropriation Funds for the 2002 Budget, Resolution No. 60, Series 2001 - <br />Setting the Mill Levy for the 2002 Budget. <br /> <br />City Manager Bill Simmons reviewed Staff's recommendations on modifying the budget <br />in the General Fund to cover areas that need revision. Those revisions are as follows: <br />High risk and tactical police training of $4,000; Participation in the Boulder County <br />Youth Corp at $18,000; Additional position in City Manager's office. He asked Council <br />to approve the requested budget modification. <br /> <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br /> <br />Mayer commented, for the record, that Council has not decided on final approval of <br />capital projects. He stressed that just because there is a number in the budget that does <br />not reflect Council approval of those projects. He stated that they may not be approved <br />or may be approved at a lower or higher level. He explained that Council would review <br />the capital programs next year. <br /> <br />Sisk noted that Council has requested that an additional position be added to the City <br />Manager's office. He stated that the position would assist the Council in assessing future <br />needs and survey the public for their desires, in terms of bond issues for funding of the <br />expansion of the Senior Center and Library and possible development of an Arts Facility. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />