My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2013 04 16
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2013 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2013 04 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:33 PM
Creation date
5/15/2013 1:23:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2013 04 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 2, 2013 <br />Page 9 of 23 <br />Council member Jasiak clarified the Open Space Advisory Board reviewed the <br />Cottonwood parcel, but did not rate it high as a priority for an open space parcel. She <br />noted the Open Space Advisory Board does not review parcels for potential parks. <br />MCCASLIN — URBAN CORRIDOR: Maximum commercial density with a Floor Area <br />Ratio (FAR) of 1.0 fronting the arterial and a maximum FAR of .5 not fronting the <br />arterial. This change provides the upcoming Small Area Plan more control in <br />determining the ultimate commercial density for the corridor. Staff modified the density <br />range in this corridor from 15 to 30 units an acre to a density range of "Up to 30 dwelling <br />units per acre." This change allows more flexibility in the small area planning process to <br />control the ultimate density for this corridor. Staff added a policy note stating "No Mixed <br />Use streets should be designated north of Centennial Pavilion shopping center". This <br />policy would effectively eliminate the possibility of a residential component being <br />permitted in the Small Area Plan north of Centennial Pavilion shopping center. <br />Planning Director Russ addressed build -out versus market and the total number of <br />residential units. Within the Framework Plan there is a possibility of 1,500 residential <br />units above what is built. The zoning already allows 500 units and there is a 1,000 <br />difference from what the Comp Plan would allow versus what the zoning allows today. <br />Those numbers will change within the small area plans to reduce or realize the 1,000 <br />units. The 500 units anticipated through the existing zoning will be developed in Steel <br />Ranch, North End, and the redevelopment district. Of the 1,000 additional units possible <br />in the Comprehensive Plan, 400 are anticipated to from the South Boulder Corridor (300 <br />east of the railroad tracks and 100 west of the tracks). 600 units have been identified as <br />possible within the McCaslin Urban Center south of Cherry Street. <br />FISCAL MODEL: The fiscal impact study was revised and will continue to be revised. <br />The difference between a 20 -year build -out and the ultimate build -out of the City, with <br />Framework Option 3 or the modified framework presented, produces a build -out where <br />there will be a surplus of commercial properties. He explained there is approximately <br />10.5 million SF of office and industrial space yet to be built. The current zoning only <br />allows 300,000 SF of additional retail. Option 3 or the modified framework allows up to <br />1.2 million SF of retail and 11 million SF of office. The reason for the additional 1,000 <br />residential units is to empower retail. Retail does not underwrite itself; it requires <br />residential units in today's market. <br />The fiscal model was updated last week to remove police services operating and capital <br />discounts previously given for infill development. Staff believes these changes do not <br />alter the overall fiscal neutrality identified in the previous fiscal analysis. One of the <br />specific recommendations of this model is to develop a detailed marginal cost fiscal <br />model to accurately assess development as it relates to the budget and existing levels <br />of service; however from a gross planning tool, the Comp Plan's fiscal model is <br />adequate and demonstrates a revenue neutral forecast from a land use perspective <br />over the next 20 years. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.