My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2013 06 17
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2013 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2013 06 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:09:17 PM
Creation date
6/19/2013 9:33:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2013 06 17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 20, 2013 <br />Page 4 of 9 <br /> <br />Robinson gave an update of the contract between the City and the Old Towne Group. <br />The initial contract will be to clean up and stabilize the structure. Following this there <br />will be a contract to secure the other phases. <br />Koertje asked if there were any advancements towards cleaning up the property line <br />dispute. <br />Robinson stated there are discussions moving forward but an agreement has not been <br />reached at this date. <br />La Grave asked about the landmarking and why it is being recommended to be <br />withdrawn. <br />Robinson stated there are too many outstanding issues, specifically in regards to the <br />boundary lines. He stated it makes more sense to withdraw the landmarking <br />application, get the boundary issues finalized, then reapply. <br />La Grave reminded staff and the HPC there is a grant application, with the state, which <br />might be affected by the withdrawal. <br />Robinson stated the application is already in and the state does not know of the <br />withdrawal. He added staff will contact the state to see if there is to be an issue with the <br />withdrawal of the landmark application. <br />Koertje asked staff to let Council know of the potential implications of withdrawing the <br />landmark application and the state grant application. <br />Watson asked if the Old Towne Group was who Economic Development Director Aaron <br />DeJong was working with for the stabilization. <br />Robinson answered in the affirmative. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the boundary discrepancies and how it affects the <br />landmark application. <br />La Grave asked who will be making the presentation to City Council for the landmark <br />request. <br />Robinson stated he would be making the presentation. <br />Stewart stated he liked what was in the outline for the contract, but he didn’t see why a <br />developer was needed at this point when it should be left up to an architect to scope out <br />the work. He then discussed some details regarding the scope. He added we would <br />like to see more specifics. <br />La Grave asked if staff has considered managing the specifics of this project in house.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.