My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Business Retention and Development Committee Agenda and Packet 2013 08 05
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUSINESS RETENTION & DEV COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Business Retention and Development Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2013 Business Retention and Development Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Business Retention and Development Committee Agenda and Packet 2013 08 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:11:22 PM
Creation date
8/14/2013 10:40:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BRADPKT 2013 08 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Business Retention & Development Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 1, 2013 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br />Quality of Life <br /> <br />Challenges: <br />Sense of Place Retail Signs <br />Setbacks and orientation Landscaping <br />Connectivity Identity <br />Restrictive and inconsistent regulations Restrictive Zoning <br />Traffic Speeds <br /> <br />Aaron stated the questions are: <br /> What are the business questions for BRaD? <br /> How much intervention is necessary? <br /> <br />Rob Lathrop asked what can be done to improve the chances of success for the Century to <br />Cherry area. Gavin McMillan said that visibility is an issue there. There are connectivity and <br />walkability issues. Emily Jasiak asked if adjusting the street between Key Bank and the retail <br />area could help. Troy Russ stated that is an involved process. Malcolm commented that <br />circulation is difficult in that area. Hank Dalton stated that we need to engage the property and <br />business owners. <br /> <br />Michael Menaker stated that Business wants predictability, consistency and fairness. The <br />PUD process is unknown and uncertain. <br /> <br />There was discussion that Small Area Plan SAP levels the playing field. <br /> <br />Susan Loo stated that she is not hearing that there is a problem in the area. She stated that if <br />business owners, property owners seek change, they should put together a group and come <br />before Council. <br /> <br />Mike Kranzdorf wonders if there is a problem to be dealt with. <br /> <br />Is changing landscaping the answer? Before doing that, a better solution may be to achieve a <br />better flow and get cross access. <br /> <br />Emily Jasiak concluded that while the ULI TAP said McCaslin lacked “Place” the one thing the <br />area has is the view of Davidson Mesa and that has inherent natural advantages. <br /> <br />RETENTION MEETINGS <br /> <br /> Staufer Realty – <br />o County Building is for lease. <br /> King Soopers <br />o Aaron and Malcolm visited with them at ICSC. The Louisville store is doing <br />awesome. <br />3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.