My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2007 08 07
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2007 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2007 08 07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2021 2:30:05 PM
Creation date
1/3/2008 10:41:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Quality Check
1/3/2008
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2007 08 07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 7, 2007 <br />Page 11 of 14 <br />Mark Zaremba, representing 'the Downtown Business Association, voiced their <br />support for the Waterloo Ice Fiouse requested patio. <br />Sarah Flynn, 1433 Wilson Placeā Louisville, CO expressed her concern over <br />smoking and noise issues associated with the outdoor patio request. <br />Marianne Gibbs, 822 LaFargE: Avenue, Louisville, CO voiced her support of the <br />outdoor patio and the Special Review Use conditions. She expressed her <br />concern over loitering and smokiing in the alley. <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br />Council member Muckle supported the Waterloo Ice House, but suggested the <br />smoking and loitering issues be addressed. He requested the patio area not be <br />a primary point of entrance. I-le supported revisiting this Special Review Use in <br />six months to review the patio use. <br />Council member Yarnell supported a six-month view of the Special Review Use. <br />Council member Clabots asked lif a Special Review Use can be called up at any <br />time by City Council. Planninig Director Wood explained a Special Review Use <br />can be called up at any time upon a complaint. <br />Council member Clabots favored a review within atwelve-month period and <br />suggested shorter patio hours. <br />Council member Marsella voiced her concern over a review of the Special <br />Review Use in light of the property's owners' investment in the property. <br />Council member Yarnell statE;d a review would not be in response to a complaint, <br />but to determine whether the conditions are effective or should be modified. <br />Mayor Sisk did not want people exiting from the patio area, but felt the liquor <br />license would restrict such activities. He also shared Council member Marsella's <br />concern over the review of the SRU. He noted the City has a noise ordinance, <br />but stressed the importance of controlling the decibel levels. <br />Mr. Karp explained they havE; already received complaints regarding construction <br />noise. He asked at what point the Special Review Use would be called up, and <br />whether he should have the decibel levels tested. <br />Mayor Sisk suggested the neighbors would probably appreciate the applicant <br />taking some pro-active measures on having decibel levels measured. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.