Laserfiche WebLink
Special Meeting Minutes <br />October 8, 2013 <br />Page 8 of 12 <br />Planning Director Russ explained in 2008 the historic preservation tax was passed by <br />the voters; Resolution No. 20, Series 2009 outlined the implementation of the fund; <br />Section 2, Subsection B of the resolution authorizes staff to support the Historic <br />Preservation Commission and City activities through the HPC Funding. Administrative <br />funding through the tax include interns, preservation planners, staff to conduct research <br />for the Historic Preservation Commission, demolition functions,assisting vendors in <br />conducting historic preservation surveys and other support staff. <br />Resolution No. 20, Series 2009 authorizes staff to administrate the HPC Fund. 2009 <br />represented the first estimate on what was needed; 20% for a Senior Planner and 5% <br />for a Preservation Planner and support for research. The percentage for administrative <br />support increased over a period of time to recognize the finance department <br />administering the fund and the museum support to research property history. With <br />respect to the Planning Department, the in-house comprehensive plan development <br />provided the resources to hire an employee to conduct current planning and provide <br />service to Historic Preservation. <br />Since 2009, the Planning Division was able to reassess the amount of time dedicated to <br />manage the Historic Preservation Fund and put together a staffing plan. He noted 99% <br />of all the requests for preservation funds throughout the historic district have been met. <br />He voiced his belief the staffing plan is reflective of the Planning staff current <br />commitment. He noted the Planning Commission has very clear guidelines and felt a <br />Preservation Master Plan will provide clear guidelines and prescribe the objectives and <br />common measurements. A Master Plan will provide a tool to manage the questions of <br />property rights and preservation. The current budget assumes the Master Plan will be <br />implemented next year. The budget number reflects the amount of time it actually takes <br />to manage the program today, which includes: 20% for the Senior Planner; 5% for the <br />Administrative Assistant and 75% for the Planner I. <br />Planning Director Russ stressed the Historic Preservation Commission has input on all <br />preservation matters and in the management of the fund, as does the City Council. <br />Every communication,staff report and analysis is prepared by the Preservation Planner <br />and the Senior Planner for presentation to the Preservation Commission. The findings <br />of the Preservation Commission are reviewed by the Planning Director and the City <br />Manager for presentation to the City Council. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton stated his understanding of a Historic Preservation Master Plan <br />should include the standards for what actually constitutes historic within a district and <br />the attributes of a historic structure. The Master Plan would have guidelines to guide a <br />discussion of the Historic Preservation Commission for landmark requests as to whether <br />they meet criteria for landmarking. Planning Director Russ confirmed the Master Plan <br />would have those guidelines. He noted the guidelines in Chapter 15 follow the general <br />National Park Standards. Many municipalities take the National Park Standards and <br />customize them for their community and the City will have such an opportunity. <br />29 <br />