Laserfiche WebLink
Special Meeting Minutes <br />October 8, 2013 <br />Page 9 of 12 <br />Mayor Muckle agreed staff is authorized to administrate the HPC Fund and the open <br />space fund allows maintenance, but funds have to be available for incentives and <br />acquisitions. <br />Council member Jasiak stated Louisville is a unique historic city and the Historic <br />Preservation Fund is a wonderful asset, which may or may not be renewed. She was <br />comfortable with the funds going to the City. <br />Council member Loo stated if everything is taken out of the general fund, there will not <br />be sufficient funds to repair the roads. She noted the taxpayers expect basic services, <br />which are paid out of the general fund. <br />Mayor Muckle stated when the open space tax first passed; general fund money was <br />spent on the maintenance of open space. General fund money was also spent on <br />historic preservation before the tax passed. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton stated the creation of a Historic Preservation Master Plan is <br />three or four years behind the curve. Having the Master Plan written by City staff, <br />opposed to aconsultant is more cost effective. He felt the Master Plan should be paid <br />through the historic preservation fund. He did not believe the uses of the HPC funds will <br />deplete the funds before the tax ends. He supported the use of funds to support the <br />Historic Preservation activities. <br />Council member Loo stated she would like to see the HPC fund become a loan fund. <br />She requested a projection on the estimated spending of the HPC funds prior to its <br />expiration. <br />Aquiles Le Grave,379 Peerless Street, Louisville, CO stated the Historic Preservation <br />Commission had hoped to complete a Historic Preservation Master Plan this calendar <br />year, but it is being proposed for next year. He stated a Master Plan was created, but <br />not adopted by Council. He believed the HPC Fund will be depleted by 2018 based on <br />the demands and the projects. He felt in all likelihood the voters probably would not <br />approve a continuation of the tax. He explained the Historic Preservation Commission <br />does have concerns about Chapter 15 and the use of the HPC funds. He was not sure <br />the voters would approve of staff time being charged to the HPC fund. He felt there are <br />two different visions; 1) a tax which will not be renewed and 2) treating it as self - <br />perpetuating over time rather than being renewed by the voters. <br />City Manager Fleming stated the Historic Preservation Funds payback to the General <br />Fund was projected to be $250,000 per year. Looking at the projections on what will be <br />available in 2014 and in out years, there were sufficient funds to cover a $500,000 <br />payback in 2014 and to cover all the anticipated projects. The intent was to accelerate <br />the payback and to offset some of the transfers out of the general fund, which totaled <br />more than $5,000,000, to address flood related activities. He stated staff will bring back <br />a projection. <br />30 <br />