Laserfiche WebLink
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Nlinutes <br />January 13, 2014 <br />Page 4of11 <br />Brew stated they do have someone in mind but have not hired anyone yet. <br />Stewart reminded the HPC of the criteria for moving or demolishing a structure and read from <br />the criteria. <br />Public Comment — None <br />La Grave asked if the discussion could go structure by structure. He recommended discussing <br />1341 Cannon first. He stated this structure does not qualify as a structure eligible for <br />landmarking. <br />Stewart stated the structure does not have architectural or social significance. <br />Stewart then announced 1000 Griffith. He stated there appears to be additions on all sides of <br />the structure. <br />Watson stated the structure has been so modified there does not appear to be much left. <br />Haley stated there is not a strong social history on this structure either. <br />Stewart introduced 1004 Griffith. He stated this structure appears to have more architectural <br />integrity. He is happy the structure is going to be retained, even though it is going to be <br />relocated. He added it was relocated before to this current area. He stated he believed it <br />would be potentially eligible for landmarking. <br />Haley asked if the building is still considered contributing if it were moved to its current location <br />in 1972. <br />La Grave stated it depended upon what we considered contributing. He felt as though the <br />relocation of the building, within the existing neighborhood, is still considered contributing. <br />Fahey stated there are a great number of structures which have been relocated. <br />Echohawk asked the applicant which would come first, demolition of the other structures or <br />relocation of this structure. <br />Brew stated he would probably demo 1000 Griffith and 1341 Cannon first and then relocate <br />1004 Griffith. <br />La Grave asked what guidelines we can create to protect the relocation of the structure. <br />Robinson stated it can be contingent through language provided in the resolution. <br />La Grave asked how soon the project might happen. <br />Rick stated he could imagine starting demolition in 45 days, but they would probably not do <br />anything until the PUD is approved. <br />Haley asked if they had a cost ceiling for when they might decide not to relocate the structure. <br />