Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Montgomery stated that at the two neighborhood meetings held there had been two major concerns <br />expressed: The loss of the open space and the traffic problems that might be generated and the <br />wildlife that uses the open space. He explained that by clustering the development in an area on the <br />west side of the project they would preserve as large an open space as possible on the east side of the <br />project. Their vision of the large open space area would be to create a habitat that would be more <br />beneficial to bird populations by planting native thickets of plum, Juniper, Sumac and various berries. <br />He went on to review the project. <br /> <br />Davidson called for public comments. <br /> <br />Wayne A. Varra, 224 Main Street, Louisville, Colorado, felt this development would destroy the <br />character and integrity of southeast Louisville. The traffic generated would cause many problems and <br /> <br />. . <br />Inconvemences. <br /> <br />Denise Ehrmann, 221 Front Street, Louisville, Colorado, stated that her children are the fourth <br />generation to live in her home and she was opposed to the annexation and development of this <br />property as it would have adverse effects on her neighborhood. She explained that the continuation <br />of Main Street into a temporary cul-de-sac would mean that Archie Damelia would have a road on <br />three sides of his home, less than 35' from his house. Another neighbor would open his front gate and <br />step right onto the street. Traffic would increase. She felt this area would make a beautiful park as <br />there are none in this area. She spoke of all the wildlife that utilize the property. She pointed out that <br />these units are 22' tall and felt they are two-story units. She asked Council to deny their request for <br />annexation and development. <br /> <br />Christine Wecker, 115 West Cherry Street, Louisville, Colorado, representing Klubert Warembourg <br />who owns land south of the proposed development, stated that they were concerned about the 100 <br />year flood plain. This past spring, due to high water, her brother had watched carp swim next to the <br />two steps into the entrance to his home which is directly south of this development. She also pointed <br />out that the development would chase the wildlife away. She was also concerned about the <br />narrowing of the streets. <br /> <br />Phil Gigliotti, 225 County Road, Louisville, Colorado, stated that he moved here from Detroit about <br />three years ago to get away from big city sprawl and he did not want to see a good thing ruined. <br /> <br />Ed Helmstead, 1000 Rex Street, Louisville, Colorado, agreed with the previous speakers. He stated <br />that he liked the architecture, but he did not like the project. <br /> <br />Laura Page, 920 Rex Street, Louisville, Colorado, stated that the annexation was premature. She felt <br />the City needed to resolve the transportation issues that exist right now, particularly the 96th/Hwy. <br />42 connection. She felt the City was intent on extending Main Street through to Bella Vista. She <br />also wanted the floodplain reevaluated. <br /> <br />Steve Mace, 925 Rex Street, Louisville, Colorado, agreed with the previous speakers. <br /> <br />3 <br />