My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1996 05 21
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1996 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1996 05 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:41 PM
Creation date
4/9/2004 2:12:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
5/21/1996
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1996 05 21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Spriggs stated that they were in agreement with all twelve conditions. He wanted to make sure that <br />the language in condition No.9 would be broad enough and specific enough that the City would be <br />exercising its sole discretion, if there was a safety problem. <br /> <br />Susan Griffiths, City Attorney, read a revised access note: "The access movements shown on the <br />PUD are subject to change. If, at any time in the future, it is determined by the City in its sole <br />discretion that change is appropriate to enhance traffic flow on one or more surrounding streets or <br />to mitigate an unsafe situation, upon notification from the City, the Centennial Valley Parcel L 1 <br />property owners shall make such physical changes at their cost as may be required by the City. Each <br />present and future Parcel L 1 property owner shall acknowledge in writing the foregoing authority of <br />the City." <br /> <br />Roll call was taken. Motion passed by a 7 - 0 vote. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 34, SERIES 1996 - FINAL PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR MICRO <br />HOUSE INTERNATIONAL - CENTENNIAL VALLEY BUSINESS PARK LOT 2, BLOCK <br />3 <br /> <br />Paul Wood, Planning Director, stated that the applicants were requesting to construct a two-story <br />office building totaling 31,600 s.f. Building lot coverage is 14% and landscaping is at 36%. In <br />reviewing the site, he pointed out that the site slopes generally to the southeast with the building <br />orientation directed toward the corner of Centennial Parkway and Century Drive. The site layout <br />included a large landscaped area in front of the building adjacent to its Centennial Parkway Frontage. <br />Signage consisted of two 3' x 12' curved precast concrete entry identification signs. An additional <br />3' x 8' ground mounted building identification sign was proposed adjacent to the main entrance. <br />Planning Commission approved Resolution No.8, Series 1996, with eight conditions of approval. <br />Resolution No. 34 reflects those conditions which had not been addressed by the applicant. <br /> <br />Davidson called for the applicant's presentation. <br /> <br />Garth Braun, Garth Braun Associates, 954 Pearl Street, Boulder, Colorado 80302, stated that Steve <br />Anderson, President and CEO of Micro House, was unable to attend. With respect to condition No. <br />2, the developer had agreed to modify the 5' utility easement to 3' for a total of 8' from their property <br />line with the additional 2' to be accommodated to the property to the east. Concerning conditions <br />No.1, 5, and 6 he went back to the uniformity and consistency within the park. On NO.1 he stated <br />that the Gateway Design Guidelines (GDG) allow for a 35' height limit for pole lights within the <br />parking lot. He asked that that be modified to 30'. He asked that condition No.5 be removed from <br />the resolution as they currently exceed the GDG for the evergreen mix. Additional evergreen <br />screening might create potential icing on the access drive. On NO.6 he stated that they demonstrated <br />on their PUD the monument sign and the entrance signs specify size, height, and size of letters. They <br />requested some flexibility in locating the exact signage on the building. They agreed to allow not <br />more than 20 s.f. per tenant and there will be one building sign identifying the building. He asked that <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.