My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2014 05 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2014 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2014 05 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:35 PM
Creation date
5/21/2014 9:56:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2014 05 06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 6, 2014 <br />Page 11 of 27 <br />alterations or modifications, therefore the HPC did not have jurisdiction. It was referred <br />to the HPC; however Mr. Stewart recused himself from the review. <br />Mr. Stewart explained the PUD Plan was to preserve the historic building on Main Street <br />and build on the infill rear property. This plan conforms to the Downtown Framework <br />Plan, which is to maintain the historic character of Main Street. He presented an <br />illustration of the property from the 1998 Framework Plan. He addressed the building <br />restrictions; firewalls within 3'. of a building; the utilities and the shared sewer lines. The <br />applicant has been working with the property owner's attorney and they have a draft <br />agreement. <br />Mr. Stewart summarized the applicant is requesting Council's support of the PUD Plan <br />proposal. The Plan meets the spirit and intent of the Downtown Framework Plan and <br />the Design Guidelines. The Plan creates an appropriate transition to the neighborhood <br />to the west. The Plan will preserve the historic architecture character along Main Street <br />and will provide pedestrian connections between the alley and Main Street. The parking <br />is primarily for an office use which will not provide a parking load during downtown <br />events. The Plan complies with established zoning and is not requesting any waivers, <br />modifications or variances. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton asked if the new building will have a new address. Planning and <br />Building Safety Director Russ stated they will work with the post office to establish A <br />and B units for the 931 Main Street address. <br />Council member Loo commented the architecture is beautiful and it will be a beautiful <br />building. She urged the applicant to include fire sprinkling because it is a very difficult <br />building to access from a Fire Department perspective and noted the facility is proposed <br />as a Child Center. She stated adding a fire sprinkler system to the building now would <br />be cheaper than adding it later on. <br />Council member Stolzmann noted there is a picture of the property in the Downtown <br />Design Handbook. She was pleased to see the gabled ends were maintained and will <br />be included in the design of the new building. <br />Mayor Muckle voiced his appreciation of preserving the historic property. He was also <br />pleased with the architecture. <br />Mayor Muckle requested public comment and hearing none, closed the public hearing. <br />MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Dalton moved to approve Resolution No. 27, Series 2014, <br />seconded by Council member Keany. All were in favor. <br />2014 DOWNTOWN PARKING STUDY <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.