My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2014 05 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2014 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2014 05 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:35 PM
Creation date
6/13/2014 7:47:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
5/20/2014
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2014 05 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 20, 2014 <br />Page 14 of 20 <br />Council member Lipton looked for a term other than "waivers." Planning and Building <br />Safety Director Russ pointed out this simply identified the possibility of the onsite <br />retention being waived if an off-site facility was utilized. It attempts to align policies. <br />Council member Stolzmann asked why call out these 3 areas; why not let them proceed <br />with the PUD process. <br />Mayor Muckle saw these as unique areas but was not opposed to language to clarify <br />that they still have to go through the entire process. <br />Attorney Light suggested adding a phrase at the end of Section 3.3 item (a) "as <br />determined by the City' and at the end of item (b) "if allowed by the City'. The first line <br />on this page to read "specific sub area plans and planned unit development "— leaving <br />out "overall ". <br />MOTION: Council member Lipton moved to approve Resolution No. 29, Series 2014, <br />with suggested changes by the City Attorney, seconded by Mayor Muckle. <br />Council member Stolzmann offered a friendly amendment to remove Section 3.3 <br />completely. Council member Lipton did not accept the friendly amendment. <br />Vote on Council member Lipton's motion: 4 -1 with Council member Stolzmann voting <br />no. <br />ORDINANCE No. 1662, SERIES 2014 — AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER <br />3.30 OF THE LOUISVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING AN EMERGENCY <br />TELEPHONE CHARGE — 2nd Reading - Public Hearing <br />Mayor Muckle requested a City Attorney introduction. <br />City Attorney Light introduced Ordinance No.1662, Series 2014. <br />Council member Loo disclosed her husband was on the BRETSA board for fourteen <br />years but was no longer. She reported she would receive no financial benefit other than <br />anyone else and felt her decision could be made without bias. <br />Mayor Muckle opened the public hearing and requested a staff presentation. <br />Police Chief Hayes explained the adoption of Ordinance No. 1662 will put Louisville in <br />compliance with state law. CRS 29 -11- 103(3)(a) which requires cities, counties, towns <br />and special districts to annually establish a 9 -1 -1 surcharge for each calendar year. <br />An ordinance establishing the 9 -1 -1 landline, wireless and Internet (VoIP) surcharge <br />within Louisville for 2014. The current surcharge of 500 per telephone number will be in <br />effect from January 1, 2014 through June 30, 2014 and a new surcharge of 750 per <br />telephone number will be in effect from July 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014. The <br />proposed rate increase is minimal, rates with the increase will still be below the <br />statewide average, and will provide the following benefits: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.