My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2014 04 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2014 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2014 04 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:21 AM
Creation date
7/30/2014 3:23:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCMIN 2014 04 10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April; 10, 2014 <br />Page 24of 37 <br />Tengler says you have been the most specific and most articulate about this. Is what <br />Steve just proposed acceptable to you? <br />O’Connell says shewould say keep it even broader for further discretion. There is a <br />risk of further preferential treatment and we need to do it in the least restricted way to <br />indicate we don’t want preferential treatment. It may mean leaving it open to all sides of <br />Memory Square if that is how it is best deemed. <br />Tengler asks could you live with the ice cream issue, scratching the pre-packaged. <br />O’Connell says she will say “no” to that. <br />Tengler says the 150’ seems like something we could agree on so with that caveat, we <br />need a motion to move it forward to City Council even if we are not completely resolved <br />on the issue of how to treat the Art Center. <br />Russ says if you describe the intent of what you want the ordinance to achieve, Staff will <br />do that with the City Attorney for City Council. We will follow your direction on that. We <br />will not present a counter alternative. <br />Tenglerasks if Brauneis can re-read what he just said. <br />Brauneis says the proposal for condition to the resolution that Staff work with the City <br />Attorney to draft language to allow events held within orinside ofthe Louisville Arts <br />Center to host food trucks as part of that event. <br />Tengler asks if there isany objection to that language. <br />Brauneis says there is no guidance of giving limitations as to whether it is one or five. <br />Do we want to put a limitation on that language as our recommendation to Council? <br />Russell says to say two or three, but would rather not. <br />Tengler says relative to the two specifics in terms of the pre-packagedice cream versus <br />scratching that and the 150’, do we need to make that a condition that you would <br />change? <br />Russ says yes because you would not have seen the draft so you make as a condition <br />of whatever you recommend and that condition will then be presented not as a condition <br />but within the next ordinance presented toCouncil. <br />Tengler asks for a motion. <br />Brauneis makes motion to approve Resolution No. 5, Series 2014, with three <br />amendments. <br />1. That Staff work with the City Attorney to draft language to allow events held within <br />the Louisville Arts Center to host food trucks. <br />2. That the distance food trucks are banned on public and private ROW be reduced to <br />150’. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.