Planning Commission Minutes 2000 02 08

Home Browse Search

Commissioner Kalish also likes the development plan. Kalish is also concerned with the removal of 22 trees along the ditch and how the existing trees will continue to live with their water source taken away from them by the piping. The ditch is her primary hang-up. Commissioner Pritchard is also concerned with the loss of the trees. At this time he is leaning toward the City taking the cash-in-lieu because of the tree removal. He feels this is a top-notch project. Commissioner McAvinew feels that if it was good enough in 1994 it is still good. McAvinew is in favor of the pipe and stated that there is plenty of water there because the ditch does leak. He likes the idea of it being piped and the whole area improved. Paul Wood added a condition that the shared parking and access agreement between Christopher Plaza I and Christopher Plaza II shall be recorded prior to or concurrent with recording of the Final Plat and Final PUD subject to Staff review and approval. Motion made by Patricia Thompson to approve Resolution No. 4, Series 2000, a resolution approving a Final Subdivision Plat and PUD Phase I, as written with the amendments made by Paul Wood. Seconded by Chris Pritchard. Roll Call Vote: Tom McAvinew, No; Chris Pritchard, Yes; Debra Kalish, Yes; Bill McDermott, Yes; Chris Leh, No; Patricia Thompson, Yes; Jeff Lipton, Yes. Motion passes 5:2. st B.Resolution No. 5, Series 2000, Lots 6 and 10, Block 3, CTC, 1 Filing. Final PUD Development Plan and Final Subdivision Replat to construct 3 speculative industrial buildings on 3 lots totaling 5 acres. Staff Public Notice Certification: Ken Johnstone, Principal Planner, certified that public notice was published a second time for this hearing in the Daily Camera on Sunday, December 26, 1999, and mailed and posted on Thursday, December 23, 1999. Staff requested a continuance from the January 11, 2000, Planning Commission meeting. All Planning Commissioners verified that they were familiar with or had visited the site. Staff Report of Facts and Issues: Mr. Johnstone stated that there are many unresolved issues on this project at this point. At this time the Staff is optimistic that most if not all of these issues could be resolved. Staff feels that the number of issues is excessive for the Planning Commission to have to consider during a public hearing process. Staff would be pleased to continue to work with the applicant to resolve these if they should wish to request a continuance. In the absence of such a request, Staff has forwarded a recommendation of denial with the basis as cited in the resolution. Mr. Johnstone noted that if 6