My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 1999 02 18 (2)
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
1994-1999 Planning Commission
>
1999 Planning Commission Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 1999 02 18 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:12 AM
Creation date
9/5/2014 3:08:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCMIN 1999 02 18 (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />grandfathered as this is the existing signage for Safeway. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lipton would like to see that the landscaping be brought-up to the Design <br />Guidelines Standards of 30% and that it could be a combination of landscaping or pedestrian <br />areas. Lipton would also like to see the east elevation dealt with somehow. <br /> <br />Staff Summary: <br /> <br />Paul Wood stated that Resolution No. 12, Series 1999, comes before the Commission with 3 <br />Conditions of approval. Staff does not object to removing the brick pilaster elements on the <br />horizontal fascia element as they are in two different planes on the development. <br /> <br />Applicant Summary: <br /> <br />Nothing further. <br /> <br />Public Hearing Closed / Commission Discussion / Vote: <br /> <br />Jeff Lipton would be amenable to volunteering a continuance to next month’s meeting and asking <br />the applicant to come back with a plan that meets the design guidelines on the landscape coverage <br />and/or pedestrian gathering places. Lipton would also like to see some kind of architectural <br />treatment on the east elevation. If the applicant came back met those two conditions, he would be <br />flexible on the signage. <br /> <br />All Commissioners agreed that the new guidelines need to be complied with. However, there <br />should be some give and take for existing buildings. <br /> <br />Chairman Boulet encouraged the Staff to work with the applicant to come to a reasonable balance <br />of the needs and requirements and then to bring that proposal forward. <br /> <br />Motion made by Jeffrey Lipton to continue Resolution No. 12, Series 1999, to the March 9, <br />1999, Planning Commission meeting with the direction to Staff to continue to work with the <br />applicant to see if they could bring the proposal closer to the requirements in the Design <br />Guidelines and to address the other issues identified. Seconded by Bill Boulet. <br /> <br />Unanimous Voice Vote to continue. <br /> <br /> <br />F.Resolution No. 13, Series 1999, Lots 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, Block 7, Business Center <br />at CTC, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Subdivision Replat for <br />speculative industrial, office, warehouse, and R&D space in three buildings <br />totaling 160,000 square feet. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.