My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 1999 03 18
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
1994-1999 Planning Commission
>
1999 Planning Commission Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 1999 03 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:12 AM
Creation date
9/5/2014 3:09:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCMIN 1999 03 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Applicant Presentation: <br /> <br />Arlin Lehman, 908 Main Street. Mr. Lehman expressed his concerns with redesigning his project <br />everytime he has to come before the Planning Commission and City Council. <br /> <br />Erik Hartronft feels that the design before the Commission is a really good design and is one that <br />has responded to all of the issues that have come up since they have gone through Council and <br />Planning Commission hearings. <br /> <br />Members of Public: <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />Commission Questions: <br /> <br />Commissioner Pritchard asked if there were any intentions of putting antennaes on top of the <br />building. Arlin Lehman indicated that he is not anticipating any use that would require antennaes. <br /> <br />Commissioner McAllister inquired as to the sidewalk plan. Craig Kitzman explained that a route <br />is being opened up to maintain a six-foot width at a minimum from the back of the curb since <br />there will be a parking lot there and this will keep some of the landscaping. <br /> <br />Chairman Boulet asked if the applicant would be willing to agree to a note reflecting storage use <br />only in the basement. Arlin Lehman stated that this basement is about 30% of the whole project <br />and that it would not be appropriate to have that much storage and that light use is intended for <br />the basement. <br /> <br />Staff Summary and Recommendations: <br /> <br />Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 9, Series 1999, with the three conditions as <br />discussed. <br /> <br />Applicant Summary: <br /> <br />Erik Hartronft referred to the pro and con discussion of Alternative A and B and that Alternative <br />B has a lot of drawbacks that are acknowlegded by Staff which the applicant agrees with. <br />Alternative A is the better solution from an architectural aesthetic standpoint. Mr. Hartronft feels <br />that a two-story version of this building also has a lot of drawbacks. <br /> <br />Public Hearing Closed/Comments from Commissioners: <br /> <br />Chairman Boulet is concerned about voting for a 29-foot height limit without knowing what it <br /> <br /> 5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.