My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 1999 11 09
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
1994-1999 Planning Commission
>
1999 Planning Commission Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 1999 11 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:13 AM
Creation date
9/5/2014 3:16:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCMIN 1999 11 09
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Commissioner McAvinew chanelizing? Hartronft realighment of the ditdhc with a backhoe. Mc <br />undergrounding hartronft 48” How aout flooding? Hartronft lack of maintenance of the ditch. <br />Adjacent property owners have been cleaning the ditch up. Agrees that some <br /> <br />Commissioner Pritchard asked about Option B regarding traffic flow. Currently a stop sign at <br />north end of would remain. Would you lose 3 parking spaces? Yes, if the road were changed. <br /> Option a is preferred no reconfiguration. Not best point as a regional standpoint. Option B <br />traffic cutting through. Hartronft only reason you would be there Flooding. Finished floor is <br />substatially below grading will be better. Probs with 1, 3 and 6 Hart. 1 need direction. 3 <br /> 6, us and ditch company. <br /> <br />Commissioner Solek sheet 4 grading plan looking at topograghy foundation close to edge of ditch <br />is a concern how would you work through with ditch company. Hartronft o.s. dedication they <br />would show were it would end up more aggressive realignment of that ditch. Solek how much <br />of existin vegitation woould be saved? Hartronft some of the cottonwoods would be taken out. <br />A lot of volunteer vegitation. Solek necessary for wildlife. What City’s intent is. Solek amenible <br />to more <br /> <br />Commissioner Boulet asked about cross-parking . Hart no need it is working fine as it is. Phase <br />II for potential retail. Hart proposal for ground use specific use on that part of the lot lease has <br />fallen through. Why no Ped access connection to phase II why no ped connection proposed to <br />Christopher Plaza area?? Hartronft stated that there is currently a ped access . Boulet will look <br />at arch on east elevation which is least interesting of elevations berry roof line. Landscaping <br />requirements, lighting on final. <br /> <br />Commissioner Thompson when was maintenance on ditch done by ditch company? Hartronft <br />believes that <br /> <br />Commissioner Solek asked corner encroaching on property line? West side of Phase II Existing <br />condition bad survey. Corner of parking lot with no parking spaces. Two-point turn. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation: <br /> <br />Mr. Wood stated approval with ten conditions. <br /> <br />Applicant Summary: <br /> <br /> <br />Public Hearing Closed/Commission Comment: <br /> <br />Commissioner Lipton does not want a path that leads no where. Staff recommends against it. <br />Rather have the cash and buy open space where it can be used. No mini corridors. Too much <br /> <br /> 3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.