My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2004 10 21
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2004 Planning Commission Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2004 10 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:15 AM
Creation date
9/10/2014 12:46:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCMIN 2004 10 21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
APPROVED – <br />11/09/2004 <br /> <br />Van Pelt stated they hoped to be started by early 2005. <br /> <br />Staff and Applicant Summary and Recommendation: <br />No additional summary or recommendation provided. <br /> <br />Public Hearing Closed Commission Comments: <br />Pritchard had no comments. <br /> <br />Kalish stated it was a good project and she supports the proposal. <br /> <br />Lipton supports the project. <br /> <br />McAvinew supports the project. <br /> <br />McDermott supports the project. <br /> <br />Roll Call Vote: <br />McDermott moved and Pritchard seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 23, Series 2004, <br />authorizing a final PUD development plan for a 15,000 square foot (SF), single-story warehouse <br />building with the following 2 conditions as recommended by staff. <br /> <br />1.It should be noted on the PUD plans that the retaining wall material will match or <br />complement building materials, subject to staff review and approval through the building <br />permit process. <br /> <br />2.It should be noted on the PUD plans that the two light poles proposed within the <br />NCWCD shall be eliminated unless written approval for the locations is granted from the <br />District. If eliminated, the applicant shall demonstrate that adequate lighting still exists <br />for that portion of the parking lot and loading area; and, if not, that additional lighting <br />shall be provided. <br /> <br />Jeff Lipton Yes <br />Michael Deborski Excused <br />Debra Kalish Yes <br />Susan Loo Excused <br />Tom McAvinew Yes <br />Bill McDermott Yes <br />Chris Pritchard Yes <br /> <br />Motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br /> <br />6.The following items are tentatively scheduled for Tuesday, November 9, 2004. <br /> <br /> <br />Lipton inquired about a quorum for the meeting. Those present stated they would be available for <br />the November 9, 2004 meeting. <br /> <br /> <br />Historic Preservation Ordinance – Discussion / Direction <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.