My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2005 02 24
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2005 Planning Commission Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2005 02 24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:15 AM
Creation date
9/10/2014 3:09:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCMIN 2005 02 24
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CORRECTED AND APPROVED – APRIL 14, 2005 <br /> <br />4)Public Comments – each speaker is asked to keep their comments to 4 minutes <br /> <br />5)Final Planning Commission Questions and Comments <br /> <br />6)Action by the Planning Commission <br /> <br />Staff and Consultant Presentation <br />Wood introduced the members of the Consultant Team (see list below) that has been contracted <br />by the City for the Citywide Comprehensive Plan 2005 Update. <br /> <br />1)Bruce Meighen, EDAW, Inc., Project Manager <br /> <br />2)Bill Cunningham, Leland Consultant Group (Fiscal Analysis) <br /> <br />3)Melissa Allen, PBS & J (Traffic) <br /> <br />4)Kathryn McCormick, McCormick and Associates (Housing) <br />He stated that each consultant will have a presentation representative of their area of <br />responsibility. <br /> <br />Wood provided brief comments of the following: <br /> <br />1)Reasons for updating the City’s Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />2)What a Comprehensive Plan is and what it is not. <br /> <br />3)The process that has been followed to get the City where they are tonight with the public <br />hearing, including a summary of the various public workshops, stakeholder interviews <br />and small group meetings. <br /> <br />Bruce Meighan, EDAW, Inc., reviewed the following: <br /> <br />1)How the document is used by the City. <br /> <br />2)The existing conditions. <br /> <br />3)The Framework Plan Document. <br /> <br />4)How the Plan would be implemented. <br /> <br />Bill Cunningham, Leland Consulting Group, reviewed the Fiscal component of the Plan with the <br />following points: <br /> <br />1)What is considered when conducting a fiscal analysis <br /> <br />a.Land use mix <br /> <br />b.Balance the uses <br /> <br />c.Timing and absorption of uses (Market Factors) <br /> <br />d.Location / direction of potential growth <br /> <br />e.Efficiency of infrastructure <br /> <br />2)Revenue Generation <br /> <br />a.Sales tax drives fiscal environment <br /> <br />b.Property tax <br /> <br />c.Local support for retail <br /> <br />3)Service vs. Cost vs. Provisions <br /> <br />a.Non-residential impacts <br /> <br />b.Residential service impacts <br /> <br />4)Fiscal equation <br /> <br />5)The Preferred Plan <br /> <br />6)The final conclusion and how it is supported by the Fiscal Analysis <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.