Laserfiche WebLink
Open Space Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />August 13th, 2014 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />There are 174 sign posts, 230 signs. Harlan broke down sign posts by types— most are <br />4x4 cedar posts. Most post have either informational or regulation signs on them. <br />Harlan noted that most posts have multiple signs on them. He also found evidence of <br />redundant signs, which could be targeted for reducing sign clutter. <br />Sun fading is a major maintenance issue. Graffiti is another issue. Temporary signs are <br />common and don't last. <br />Harlan noted that the signage tends to be inconsistent. He presented the example of the <br />text and colors of the "no dogs allowed" signs at Davidson Mesa. Ember suggests that <br />part of the problem is that staff has recycled a lot of old signs to save money. Harlan <br />also found examples of signs being obscured by private property vegetation. <br />"Sign Clutter" is a subjective measure. Residents tend to add lost /found signs to <br />signposts increasing clutter. Harlan presented several examples of places where there <br />was very high sign density. With the McCaslin underpass, the signs went from 30 signs <br />to 18 signs, showing how a uniform, strategic plan of sign placement can lead to less <br />clutter. <br />Harlan broke down the number of signs along each of the "corridors" identified by the <br />wayfinding subcommittee, and found large number variation between corridors, <br />suggesting an inconsistent sign placement strategy. <br />Christopher asked whether using icons or signs were more effective than text. Harlan <br />suggested that icons are good, so long as they are well- understood. He also suggested <br />that people would give a sign about 1 second of their time, so icons might help there. <br />Helen asked whether the inventory included the material of the signs themselves. <br />Ember and Harlan suggested that most are either road -sign standards or stickers over <br />aluminum (which are easy to replace). <br />Ember brought in an email from a citizen (in packet) involving dogs on leash. Ember <br />gets a lot of temporary sign requests and read us a few. She tends to put up white <br />temporary sign posts and temporary educational signs to address these concerns. <br />Missy asked if there are any places were temporary signs requests come frequently. <br />Harlan and Ember said they get a lot of request for dogs on leash at Davidson, <br />Warembourg, and Coal Creek. They get "Share the trail" requests at North and Coal <br />Creek. <br />Missy asked if the rules and regulation signs locations are standardized. Ember <br />answered that they try to put them at property entrances and major trail intersections. <br />Linda asked if signs ever blow over. Harlan answered that permanent sign posts never <br />blow over, but that temporary signs frequently blow over. <br />The board discussed the semantic difference between educational and informational <br />signs and how showing people the logic of rules improves compliance. <br />4 <br />