Laserfiche WebLink
<br />RESOLUTION NO. 61, SERIES 1996 - FINAL PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR <br />KRYPTONICS - LOTS 4 & 5, BLK 3 - CTC <br /> <br />Paul Wood, Planning Director, stated the applicant was requesting a Final PUD Development Plan <br />for a 43,873 s.f office/warehouse facility for Turbo-K, AKA Kryptonics, manufacturer/distributor <br />of in-line skating components. They currently have a facility in the CTC. The proposed use for this <br />new building would be packaging and distribution, with associated office space, with employment <br />projected at a maximum of 40 people. The southern access straddles the property line with Lot 3 and <br />a shared access easement will need to be recorded. Parking is entirely in front of the building with <br />several landscaped islands to break up the 49 parking spaces. Signage is a 2' x 5' concrete ground <br />sign at the entrance off Pierce, a wall mounted sign with non-illuminated letters just above the roof <br />plane of the metal roof projection, and an illuminated 14 s.f logo just under the building parapet. Site <br />lighting would be provided by 22' light poles with 150 watt, high pressure sodium fixtures. Staff <br />recommended that metal halide be substituted for the sodium fixtures. Planning Commission <br />approved the request with seven conditions on August 22, four of which had been complied with. <br />The remaining three conditions plus two additional had been forwarded on this resolution. <br /> <br />Davidson called for the applicant's presentation. <br /> <br />Garth Braun, Garth Braun Associates, 954 Pearl Street, Boulder, Colorado 80302, asked that the <br />lights be left as high pressure sodium. They felt it was a more efficient light. <br /> <br />Davidson called for Council questions. <br /> <br />Keany wanted the tree caliper specified. <br /> <br />Mayer moved that Council approve Resolution 61, Series 1996, Final PUD Development Plan for <br />Kyrptonics at CTC with all accompanying amendments. Seconded by Howard. <br /> <br />Howard offered a friendly amendment that condition NO.5 on the resolution be stricken. <br /> <br />Mayer accepted that. <br /> <br />Keany moved that Council amend Resolution No. 61 to require an escrowed amount or Letter of <br />Credit for the sidewalk. Seconded by Sisk. <br /> <br />Lathrop did not feel it was fair to impose this at this point in the existing park. He did support the <br />notation on the PUD requiring all the owners to ante up at the time the master plan is approved and <br />implemented. <br /> <br />Howard thought new rules that the City and the CTC are going to be drafting would be the <br />appropriate time to include the older section with the new. <br /> <br />7 <br />